User talk:WhitneyWells

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warren Snodgrass, M.D. (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Warren Snodgrass, M.D. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 01:52, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! WhitneyWells, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 01:52, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warren Snodgrass, M.D. (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CookieMonster755 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Warren Snodgrass, M.D. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CookieMonster755 (talk) 04:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless

Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:05, 10 April 2015 (UTC) RHaworth please read the Creating File talk page where I listed out the copyright details in explanation. I was in a rush and did not see all the other drop down choices on my mac until I went for the third image. So sorry. Just take it down fi theres an issue. There isn't an option for the one I needed and you commented on the wrong place...take them down if you want. It's not my page anyway. I was just trying to help as it asks for help at the top of the hypo page "several critical errors." you bet. The whole page was incorrect. WhitneyWells (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Warren Snodgrass has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Warren Snodgrass. Thanks! Kharkiv07 ^Talk 20:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warren Snodgrass has been accepted

Warren Snodgrass, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kharkiv07 ^Talk 22:26, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional editing

Like we discussed when Warren Snodgrass was a draft, the information about the charity doesn't belong in the article because it hasn't been written about in any detail in independent reliable sources. (Think newspapers, books or major magazines. Some websites are reliable, but Facebook generally isn't - and a website connected to the founders or the charity definitely isn't independent.) I know that you had expressed that you wanted the charity info in the entry because of an upcoming event, but this isn't the right forum to promote a charity, business or individual.

Given that previous comment, you probably want to declare a conflict of interest on your user page. That way, people will understand that you aren't trying to be sneaky in your edits on behalf of any entity. You can click on your red username in the upper right corner of this page to create your user page and type a short statement about any conflict of interest. I hope this explanation helps a little bit. EricEnfermero (Talk) 22:08, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're running into the same problems, with the passage of time being the only change in this situation. Can we discuss this, before getting into situations that Wikipedia refers to as the three-revert rule and conflict of interest editing? Any good reason not to follow these established guidelines? Thanks. EricEnfermero (Talk) 00:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They have now discussed Operation Happenis on NBC. I posted the article when siting the sentence hence "notability." NBC says, "a charity called Operation Happenis to raise awareness about the birth defect, which affects one in 200 boys throughout the world."

Also, the book is a published book which has already sold over 100 copies in a month of release. How is this not notable? And what is wrong with adding a picture of the doctor to his biography page? I don't understand. Please explain. WhitneyWells (talk) 02:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your email first and replied there. I appreciate you discussing this, but the information that you need should be in the email. If you don't get it or you still have questions about notability, self-published sources, editing with a conflict of interest, or other matters, let me know. EricEnfermero (Talk) 03:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Figure 1 Distal Hypospadias.png

The file File:Figure 1 Distal Hypospadias.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]