User talk:Seventh Ward Dragon/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Seventh Ward Dragon. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Proposed deletion of New Hampshire Corporation and Uniform Commercial Code Division

The article New Hampshire Corporation and Uniform Commercial Code Division has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack all notability, and not a good redirect either as it combines the name of two divisions (a combination apparently only used on Wikipedia[1])

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:23, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of New Hampshire Corporation Division

A tag has been placed on New Hampshire Corporation Division requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 12:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of New Hampshire Division of Securities Regulation

A tag has been placed on New Hampshire Division of Securities Regulation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 12:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of New Hampshire Division of Elections

A tag has been placed on New Hampshire Division of Elections requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 12:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of New Hampshire Administration Division

A tag has been placed on New Hampshire Administration Division requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 12:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Archive moved

Hello, I moved your talk page archive to User talk:WhichUserAmI/Archive 1 as it incorrectly was in the mainspace. I also updated the link in the box above to reflect this. If you would like a bot to automatically archive your talk page for you, please see User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis. Uhai (talk) 16:48, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. WhichUser AmI 18:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bikers Against Child Abuse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stigma. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Tagging stub articles

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, I noticed that you have added the {{lead too short}} tag to several stub pages. As the stub templates at the bottom of the articles already marks them for expansion, I have removed the new tags as unhelpful. There is little point in focusing on the lead when the page totals 2 to 5 sentences of content. • Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Noted, I will avoid this in the future. Thank you WhichUserAmI? message me 21:36, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

User page move

Please don't move your user page to other namespaces. Is there something you're trying to accomplish? -- ferret (talk) 22:05, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I was attempting to merge my user and talk pages as User:StartOkayStop seems to have done. WhichUser AmI 22:08, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Replace your user page with this: #redirect [[User talk:WhichUserAmI]] -- ferret (talk) 22:09, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Will do, sorry for the confusion. WhichUser AmI 22:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disrupt Corporation (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Disrupt Corporation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, WhichUserAmI! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jak Wilmot (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jak Wilmot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:44, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disrupt Corporation (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Disrupt Corporation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:16, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Disrupt Corporation has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Disrupt Corporation. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jak Wilmot (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jak Wilmot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 19:33, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

You are blocked from editing the Nintendo DS. You've refused to slow down and stop making bad edits of your own accord, so a partial block is needed to enforce it. It'll last 2 days. You're free to submit WP:EDITREQUESTs from the articles talk page if you wish to edit it in the meantime. Sergecross73 msg me 16:26, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] When I opened up with "For starters", alongside my initial warning that your content was nowhere near appropriate, I really felt like I was being clear that there were many issues with your edits, and I was only beginning to explain the issues. Like I was alluding to before, there's a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia. And the worst thing you can do is jump right in and make massive changes to popular articles and have an attitude about it when someone points out how wrong you're doing things. I can keep explaining if you truly are interested in learning. But if you just want to sloppily write whatever you want, go start a blog or make a Twitter account or something. Sergecross73 msg me 17:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] Alright, so here's some more guidance. Every single thing you add to Wikipedia must be verified (WP:V) by a reliable source (WP:RS). The burden (WP:BURDEN) is on you to provide it when you are the one adding the info. Reliable sources are generally ones that are well-known and professional publications - think Eurogamer or IGN. You can look at WP:VG/S for a long list of ones deemed usable or unusable. You cannot use Wikipedia pages themselves - that violates WP:USERG - you can't use any sources where anyone can alter it at any time. Sergecross73 msg me 17:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] Okay, I understand more clearly now. Thanks. WhichUserAmI (talk) 18:32, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added was copied from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 20:12, 28 June 2022 (UTC)