User talk:Westrextravels
Westrextravels, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Westrextravels! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 26 July 2019 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr Dawar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr Dawar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zinzhanglee (talk) 15:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
September 2019
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mr Dawar. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Dharmalion76 (talk) 20:44, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mr Dawar
[edit]Hello, Westrextravels,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Eagleash and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Mr Dawar for deletion, because it seems to be an article that has been already decided by a [decision] to be unsuitable for inclusion.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Eagleash}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Eagleash (talk) 11:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Note: Struck comment / post, mis-clicked on 'speedy'. Nominated at AfD as below. Eagleash (talk) 12:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Westrextravels
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Eagleash and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Mr Dawar, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr Dawar (2nd nomination).
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Eagleash}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Eagleash (talk) 11:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.