User talk:Zinzhanglee

Pls let me know what to do improve the article Prabal Kumar Basu. I want to do the necessary editing to be placed and published it in wikipedia.

Welcome

Hello, Zinzhanglee, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Zinzhanglee, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:57, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indian School Ajman

Hi I'm Barkeep49. I have declined your nomination of Indian School Ajman for speedy deletion. As a school, it is not eligible for WP:A7 as the bolded text points out. Further, the page is neutrally written enough to not be considered unambiguous advertising requiring a fundamental rewrite to be appropriate. If you have any questions about this or other speedy deletion criteria, please don't hesitate to ping me here or leave a message on my talk page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, @Barkeep49: I agree with you. Thanks for your contributions. Zinzhanglee (talk) 03:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of THE Prabal Kumar Basu

Please Don't delete the article namely "Prabal Kumar Basu". Let me know the process what to do to improve the article. I will link the references with the article. I have removed the external links. Within few days I will edit the external links with connection to the main article. Please give me some time to these editing. As per my best knowledge all the datas given in the article is genuine. Thanks. Dass sundaram (talk) 05:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why you are so eager to save this article. Do you have any conflict of interest with this person? Zinzhanglee (talk) 09:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	helle Sir, I have carefully edited the the article namely Prabal Kumar Basu with references and proper citation. please pgo through it. pls dont delete this srticle. all informations provided in this article is true as per my best knowledge. Dass sundaram (talk) 04:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zinzhanglee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, Anyone please review why I can't edit. I think its a mistake Zinzhanglee (talk) 12:16, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zinzhanglee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am doing only useful edits to Wikipedia and will always continue to do so. I don't have any connection with anyone for any work I do. I guess there is some problem with my area IP range which has caused this problem. It is a very populated area. Please review my request. I hereby declare:

that the block was not necessary to prevent damage or disruption. This block is no longer necessary because I have understood the issue for what I blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead. I only conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block (this can happen if a block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and I am unintentionally blocked as a result because I use the same IP range. Zinzhanglee (talk) 12:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reasons for the block. MER-C 16:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zinzhanglee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand now why I have been blocked. It is due to I commented keep vote without checking COI editing on Kelvin Wu article. I really don't know that this article has COI issues. I just gave Keep vote on the basis of seeing above references. I don't have any personal intention to save that article nor do I have a connection with that person and other wiki editors. Please have a look at the wiki contributions I have only intended to provide good-faith work in Wikipedia. And I still want to do it. Please have a look at my request. From now on I will be more careful in AFD voting. I again define that I don't have any connection with Kelvin Wu and other editors. I do edit in Wikipedia for good faith. And want to do it again if given second chance. Please, admins, I request you to please give me a chance. I will be very useful Zinzhanglee (talk) 17:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

CU reviewed; very obvious abuse of multiple accounts for promotional purposes. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:19, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I suppose I should add a note here. I am always happy for others to independently review any block I perform. I contend that this user does know the other participants noted in the block log, and in all likelihood the other blocked user who voted keep in the AfD (and possibly some other accounts). There is additional CU evidence which I can't publicly disclose which supports this block, however this information is only available to other checkusers (they know where to look). -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 00:08, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Central American place name etymologies

Hello, Zinzhanglee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Central American place name etymologies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 16:51, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of South American place name etymologies

Hello, Zinzhanglee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of South American place name etymologies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 16:52, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]