User talk:Westburn World

Welcome!

Hi Westburn World! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Longhair\^talk 04:22, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Book height

Hi. Just wanted to bring this here. I see you reverted my edit at Ed Book without explanation despite my attempts to make it clear in my edit summaries that there is no source for the height you are claiming and without a source, your content falls under original research, which is prohibited on Wikipedia. Wikipedia relies on reliable, established sources. Basketball New Zealand listed him as 210 cm [1], as did New Zealand Olympics [2]. Sports-Reference [3] listed him as 6'11". The height field as actually specifically Listed height, not true height. I want to avoid further edit warring so I would really like a response from you here. I would like you to reconsider your revert based on me reaching out in good faith here. Thank you. DaHuzyBru (talk) 12:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DaHuzyBru Ed Book's height is 2.13m not 2.10m Westburn World (talk) 10:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply, but you have not addressed my concerns. Is there a source online to support 2.13m? An edit simply cannot be based on "your knowledge". It needs to be verifiable. Please elaborate. DaHuzyBru (talk) 13:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ed Book, you may be blocked from editing. DaHuzyBru (talk) 05:23, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DaHuzyBru the source is from Ed Book himself since I actually know Ed Book myself and he is where I get my information from Westburn World (talk) 11:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How can you verify that? How can I or anyone else know what you are saying is true? I have linked this before, but please have a read of Wikipedia:No original research. There is no reliable, published source for that height. If it can't be verified, we can't have it on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not the place for Righting great wrongs. I have also noted this to you before, but the infobox field is Listed height, not true height. He is not listed as 213cm online, simple as that. DaHuzyBru (talk) 13:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Streets Lights in New Zealand

Hello, Westburn World,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username VickKiang, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Streets Lights in New Zealand for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang 00:47, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Westburn World -- I've declined this immediate deletion as I thought you might be trying to develop an article on this topic. I've moved the start to draftspace so that you can continue to develop it at your own pace. You can edit it at: Draft:Streets lights in New Zealand. Reliable references are essential for all content, so please don't move it back to mainspace without providing some sources. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 01:45, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Streets Lights in New Zealand moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Streets Lights in New Zealand, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 06:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Streets lights in New Zealand being sent to Draft

Hey @Westburn World, I noticed that the article you recently created, Streets_lights_in_New_Zealand, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Your article was moved to to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption and to give it a space where it can be worked on and expanded. If you want to work on the article there I'm more than willing to help you out and am willing to go over the AfC process after it's done. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 06:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Streets Lights in New Zealand

A tag has been placed on Streets Lights in New Zealand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ––FormalDude (talk) 06:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let me explain, as this is probably frustrating. Wikipedia is first and foremost an encyclopedia, which means we must have substantial text which accompanies images, to place them into context. For an example of that, see Road signs in the United Kingdom. Substantial paragraphs of text are interspersed with appropriate images.

Here's my recommendation: Write 400 words on street lights in NZ, sourced to at least two distinct sources. Try [4] and [5]. Then start adding images. Cheers, Ovinus (talk) 06:44, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Streets Lights in New Zealand (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FormalDude was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see our bare minimum requirements of verifiability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Streets Lights in New Zealand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

––FormalDude (talk) 06:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Westburn World! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ––FormalDude (talk) 06:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]