User talk:West Virginian/Archive 31
Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #241 |
This is an archive of past discussions about User:West Virginian. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 |
Nomination of Princess Theresa of Bavaria (b. 1931) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Theresa of Bavaria (b. 1931) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 18:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Ethel McGhee Davis
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Ethel McGhee Davis has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
I see that the article is shortly to be awarded GA status. Congratulations.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:59, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist, thank you tremendously for completing the copyedit of the article for Ethel McGhee Davis. Its soon-to-be GA status is a testament to your review, copyedit, and changes! I really appreciate your copyedits and I am excited each time you choose to copyedit one of my articles! Thanks again, and I look forward to working with you in on my next article! -- West Virginian (talk) 14:23, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- @West Virginian: Thank you for your kind remarks but more so for interesting articles that are a joy to edit. Stay safe, Twofingered Typist (talk) 17:54, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ethel McGhee Davis
The article Ethel McGhee Davis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ethel McGhee Davis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaroleHenson -- CaroleHenson (talk) 17:21, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Archduchess María of Austria (b. 1967) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archduchess María of Austria (b. 1967) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 16:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Valerie, Margravine of Baden for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valerie, Margravine of Baden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 17:49, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
Nomination of Archduchess Maria Beatrix of Austria-Este for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archduchess Maria Beatrix of Austria-Este until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help!) 15:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXX, June 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Houses in Logan County, West Virginia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:56, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Ethel McGhee Davis
Hello! Your submission of Ethel McGhee Davis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 10:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
WikiCup 2020 July newsletter
The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
- Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
- The Rambling Man , with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
- Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.
Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally, MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
GOCE review of James Edwin Campbell (poet)
Hello, West Virginian. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for James Edwin Campbell (poet) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Tdslk (talk) 19:11, 5 July 2020 (UTC) |
(I should note that in your copy edit request you asked about incorporating more material from a specific book into the article. I couldn't access the book, and that's not something that we typically do at the Guild of Copy Editors, so I wasn't able to fulfill that part of your request. Regards, Tdslk (talk) 20:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC))
- Tdslk, thank you so much for taking the time to complete this copyedit! I thoroughly appreciate it! -- West Virginian (talk) 18:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Category:Buildings and structures in Charles Town, West Virginia has been nominated for deletion
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Defunct banks based in West Virginia
A tag has been placed on Category:Defunct banks based in West Virginia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:08, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXI, July 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Ethel McGhee Davis
On 16 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ethel McGhee Davis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ethel McGhee Davis, an alumna of Spelman College, later served as the school's first African-American dean and was a member of its board of trustees for 24 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ethel McGhee Davis. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ethel McGhee Davis), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Nomination of Line of succession to the former throne of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former throne of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 12:11, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
The article Prince Welf Ernst of Hanover has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable member of family which was deposed some time ago.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 13:37, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Archduchess Dorothea of Austria for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archduchess Dorothea of Austria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JoelleJay (talk) 00:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
The article Countess Marie von Hochberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Genealogy cruft, notability queried 9 years ago.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 16:37, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Alexandra, Princess of Leiningen for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra, Princess of Leiningen (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 17:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Princess Ortrud of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Ortrud of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Princess Maria Cristina of Savoy-Aosta for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Maria Cristina of Savoy-Aosta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 20:14, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Princess Friederike of Hanover for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Friederike of Hanover (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 14:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Princess Lucia of Bourbon-Two Sicilies for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Lucia of Bourbon-Two Sicilies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 12:28, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Duchess Elisabeth of Württemberg (b. 1933) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duchess Elisabeth of Württemberg (b. 1933) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 13:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Prince Antoine of Bourbon-Two Sicilies for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Antoine of Bourbon-Two Sicilies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 13:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Surtsicna, I contributed to some of these articles over ten years ago. I've moved on to other topics, and I've learned a lot about sourcing and notability since. It's not necessary to leave me messages about these articles. If you'd like to have them deleted, that is fine by me. My talk page is littered with these messages, and I'd prefer not to participate in these discussions. Thank you. -- West Virginian (talk) 13:18, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
James M. Canty Copyedit
Hello, West Virginian. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for James M. Canty at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! This is my first copyedit with GOCE, so please ping me if I made any mistakes :) WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 09:42, 3 August 2020 (UTC) |
- WikiMacaroons, thank you for taking the time to perform this copy edit. — West Virginian (talk) 11:33, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John H. Hill
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John H. Hill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProfessorDeYaffle -- ProfessorDeYaffle (talk) 15:41, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- ProfessorDeYaffle, thank you for choosing to review this article for GA status. I look forward to working with you throughout this review process. Please let me know if you have any questions for me in the meantime, or if you require additional information. Thanks again! -- West Virginian (talk) 20:59, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXII, August 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Category:Kinsky has been nominated for renaming
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
Ten years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:07, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, thank you so much for making my day a very special one with this wonderful anniversary message! Thank you for your continued camaraderie and your contributions to the Wikipedia community! — West Virginian (talk) 19:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you! Did you know that I was given that distinction the same month? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, thank you so much for making my day a very special one with this wonderful anniversary message! Thank you for your continued camaraderie and your contributions to the Wikipedia community! — West Virginian (talk) 19:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of James Edwin Campbell (poet)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article James Edwin Campbell (poet) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 16:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
John H. Hill
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article John H. Hill has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Best of luck with the GA review.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
P.S. I noticed that the GA review does not seem to have been completed. I left a note on the reviewer's page.
- Twofingered Typist, thank you so much for your thorough copyedit of this article, as always! I will follow-up with the GA reviewer regarding the copyedit and to check-in on their progress. Thanks again for everything you do to improve and ensure the quality of Wikipedia's content! -- West Virginian (talk) 14:24, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of James Edwin Campbell (poet)
The article James Edwin Campbell (poet) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:James Edwin Campbell (poet) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 08:41, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Larry Hockett, thank you so much for your thorough GA review of this article! I will begin reviewing and addressing your comments one at a time and I will notify you once I've addressed everything. Thanks again for your phenomenal and detailed review and feedback! -- West Virginian (talk) 14:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
WikiCup 2020 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
- Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
- HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
- Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.
Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of James Edwin Campbell (poet)
The article James Edwin Campbell (poet) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:James Edwin Campbell (poet) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 03:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Angie Turner King
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Angie Turner King you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Maile66 -- Maile66 (talk) 19:21, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- West Virginian there are some minor grammar issues that need to be dealt with. Please see the "Is it well written" part of the review. Once we get those fixed, everything else looks good. — Maile (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Maile66, it is such a distinguished honor to have you review one of my articles for GA! I really appreciate your comprehensive and thorough review, and I’m working to address your comments and suggestions as soon as possible. I’ll notify you as soon as I complete this! Thanks again! — West Virginian (talk) 00:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Maile66, thank you again for your review! I've finished addressing your comments and suggestions, and have responded to each on the review page. Please let me know if you have any further suggestions or questions in the meantime! And again, I appreciate your time and I value your guidance! -- West Virginian (talk) 14:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- West Virginian your nomination has passed, but the bot seems to be a little sluggish about posting the news here. Thanks for your contributions. — Maile (talk) 18:14, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Maile66, thank you so much again for your review and guidance. It was a true honor to work with you throughout this process, and I look forward to working with you again in the future! — West Virginian (talk) 20:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- West Virginian your nomination has passed, but the bot seems to be a little sluggish about posting the news here. Thanks for your contributions. — Maile (talk) 18:14, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Maile66, thank you again for your review! I've finished addressing your comments and suggestions, and have responded to each on the review page. Please let me know if you have any further suggestions or questions in the meantime! And again, I appreciate your time and I value your guidance! -- West Virginian (talk) 14:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Maile66, it is such a distinguished honor to have you review one of my articles for GA! I really appreciate your comprehensive and thorough review, and I’m working to address your comments and suggestions as soon as possible. I’ll notify you as soon as I complete this! Thanks again! — West Virginian (talk) 00:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue Issue CLXXIII, September 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
James M. Canty
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy editors of the article James M. Canty has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
I felt that the distance of Canty's farm from the campus was so close that the actual distance measurement and conversion looked odd, so I substituted them with a descriptor. I have not done so, but I would suggest you move the Later Life and Death section to just before the Legacy section. This seems a more natural flow to me.
Best of luck with the GAN.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist, thank you tremendously for performing another thorough and comprehensive copyedit! I really appreciate all your efforts in improving this article, and I concur with your edits! Thanks again, as always! -- West Virginian (talk) 23:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- You're most welcome! Twofingered Typist (talk) 11:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Angie Turner King
The article Angie Turner King you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Angie Turner King for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Maile66 -- Maile66 (talk) 05:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Missing cites in Wappocomo (Romney, West Virginia)
Hi, the article cites "Coleman 1951", "Rose 1976", "William and Mary Quarterly 1898", and "Rice 2015", but no such works are listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script (explained at Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors) so that such errors are highlighted in the future. Thanks! Renata (talk) 01:43, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Renata, thank you so much for your message, and for your edits to this and other articles regarding harv and sfn. I have added the references back into the bibliography in this article. Thanks again! — West Virginian (talk) 14:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Angie Turner King
On 21 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Angie Turner King, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that West Virginia State College professor Angie Turner King was an educator and mentor to entomologist Margaret S. Collins and NASA mathematician Katherine Johnson of Hidden Figures? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Angie Turner King. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Angie Turner King), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Your GA nomination of John H. Hill
The article John H. Hill you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John H. Hill for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProfessorDeYaffle -- ProfessorDeYaffle (talk) 00:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
DYK for James Edwin Campbell (poet)
On 25 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James Edwin Campbell (poet), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that James Edwin Campbell, the first president of West Virginia State University, was among the first African-American poets to write poems in the African-American vernacular dialect? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Edwin Campbell (poet). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, James Edwin Campbell (poet)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases