User talk:Wendwell

Gideon Koren

I, like you, I have posted documented comments to the Gideon Koren page, further documented them in talk and then had them reverted anyway by Dr Koren (Ciche.) serving as his own PR agent. What are our options. He claims the CAUT report is out of date and new information has come forward, but he doesn't post it. Then he puts more weight in the book review in the entertainment section of MacCleans then the 527 page CAUT report and the Supplement. Request deletion because WP should not serve as his personal free PR machine?. pikipiki (talk) 06:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So you say, but you do not represent anything accurately, including me. The documentation I and others have presented goes far beyond one article. What you've written here is a misrepresentation. But who can rehash with you endlessly? If a deletion of this entry were to be made, it would be because of this obsessive negative sort of editing of a biography of a living person, which has often ventured into libel -- and no, Pikipiki (or Wendwell or any others, if there are such... I repeat what I've said elsewhere, stop claiming that someone is libeling anonymous you. That's silly. Repeating your accusations about me in multiple locations does not make them true, nor justify the perspective you're propogating. We are not here to give our personal perspectives. I am protesting your actions as I did Wendwell's because of their gross disproportion. I have no involvement in this issue, despite your repeated slights to me, personally, but I am beginning to understand how those who do have a vested interest are operating to perpetuate spiteful edit warring. I came across this entry two years ago when one of you posted capitalized slurs in bold type across the brief entry that existed at that time. That was blatant vandalism. Since then, I have learned a great deal about the issue and have tried to foster NPOV. You have your axes to grind, clearly. Very tough to try to create a balanced entry under the circumstances. 23:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Ciche (talk) 23:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome.

Hello, Wendwell, and welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page.

Remember to change the copyright notice at http://www.codt.org/dictionary.htm to indicate it's now licensed under the GFDL, or sending an email from an official @codt.org email address indicating that you own the copyright to the page and release it under the GFDL. -- Jeandré, 2007-02-25t13:21z

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Gideon Koren. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Uncle Milty (talk) 14:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Proposed deletion of The Rehearsal (novel)

The article The Rehearsal (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

there is no indication that this book is notable to the standard required by Notability (books).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 16:44, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Representation of Paraphilias in the Arts

Hello, Wendwell. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Representation of Paraphilias in the Arts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 00:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Representation of Paraphilias in the Arts

Hello, Wendwell. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Representation of Paraphilias in the Arts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 18:25, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]