User talk:Weirdo with a Beardo

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Common elements of Final Fantasy, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Kariteh (talk) 15:14, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Final Fantasy VII

You're really insistent, eh? Please at least format the references that you add per WP:CITE/ES. Gary King (talk) 17:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Why did you remove my edits? Weirdo with a Beardo (talk) 17:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Keep the conversation at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Help_my_edits_are_being_reverted and don't bring it to three different places. Gary King (talk) 17:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I have responded. Gary King (talk) 18:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Spanish

Umm, actually, refs that are in another language that are clearly translated are welcome. King Rock (Gears of War) 17:22, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Opposes at FLC

Are you going to continue your animosity towards me for a while? A single unreliable source is hardly a reason to oppose when it can easily be removed or replaced. Gary King (talk) 18:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

I will continue to assume good faith with you, however, so please strike your opposes at the FLCs if you believe that they have been resolved. If not, then state why not. Also, feel free to continue commenting on my FLCs as I could use a link checker. Cheers! Gary King (talk) 18:51, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Huh? There is no animosity :/ Featured content must have 100% reliable sources. Please replace the unreliable ones and I'll gladly support. Weirdo with a Beardo (talk) 18:52, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

I already replaced them. Gary King (talk) 18:54, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, we wrote our posts at the same time and there was an edit conflict. I'm currently checking the articles. Why do you note that you assume good faith though? what did I do that made you consider assuming bad faith? I've been consistently treated with paranoia and indirect ostracism by WP:VG and WP:FF since I registered, it's odd. Weirdo with a Beardo (talk) 18:58, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Because it's obvious we have a "history" and I fine it odd that of all places, you had to comment on my FLCs. Obviously I recognized your username in my watchlist and just found it strange, especially considering I had never seen you at FLC before. But, by all means, continue reviewing at FLC if you want. I'm just saying it's a strange coincidence. Gary King (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Anyways, I really, really don't mind more activity at my FACs and FLCs as they rarely get comments, so if you have a chance, feel free to take a look at the ones I nominated at WP:FAC and WP:FLC. Gary King (talk) 19:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

It's not a coincidence, I looked at your contributions and found these FLCs, and since I like these bands too I commented. I think my comments were well-founded, so there's no ill will or stalking involved; I didn't think there would be problems. Weirdo with a Beardo (talk) 19:06, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I figured you look at my contributions since I guess I'm one of the first persons you encountered here; that's fine. As I said, I need more comments anyways, as the FLCs are usually not as active as one would hope. Gary King (talk) 19:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Reliable sources

Please don't continue disrupting articles until you actually understand WP:RS (the page you're citing) and WP:V. WP:VG/S contains justification for most of the sources you're trying to remove. Please stop. Thanks. —Giggy 13:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello and welcome

Hi. I was the editor which informed the WikiProject Final Fantasy about your Final Fantasy character article. I was rereading the thread when I noticed your post about not being informed and felt you were being plotted against. (Almost two weeks late, but I don't have the page on my watchlist.) I apologize for the chain of events that transpired there and hope you did not get a bad impression of the Wikipedia editors.

I would have talked it out with you myself, but my available time on Wikipedia for the past couple of months has been erratic. Once again, I hope it did not leave you with any sour feelings, and I offer my assistance if you have any questions on Wikipedia's numerous—and often confusing—policies and guidelines. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 14:38, 29 July 2008 (UTC))

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Natasha Bedingfield awards

All done Gary King (talk) 16:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Lists

Hey WWAB, just a quick word to say hi, and thanks for your contributions to WP:FLC over the past few days. Much appreciated and, if you can, keep up the good work! The Rambling Man (talk) 16:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:The 3rd Birthday Bride.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The 3rd Birthday Bride.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:37, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The 3rd Birthday Bride.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The 3rd Birthday Bride.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:27, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Androgynous characters in Final Fantasy listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Androgynous characters in Final Fantasy. Since you had some involvement with the Androgynous characters in Final Fantasy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)