User talk:Webdevelopmentfellow

Welcome!

Hello, Webdevelopmentfellow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Piguy101 (talk) 00:15, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Love Leadership:The New Way To Lead In A Fear-Based World

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Love Leadership:The New Way To Lead In A Fear-Based World, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0470428783.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:20, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Your addition to How the Poor Can Save Capitalism has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Piguy101 (talk) 23:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Love Leadership:The New Way To Lead In A Fear-Based World

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Love Leadership:The New Way To Lead In A Fear-Based World requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0470428783.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Piguy101 (talk) 23:07, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Webdevelopmentfellow. You have new messages at Talk:Love Leadership:The New Way To Lead In A Fear-Based World.
Message added 00:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Piguy101 (talk) 00:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation is a serious issue

I see that you have repeatedly copied content and images directly from other websites. This is a copyright violation. Please read Wikipedia:Copyright violations. If you continue to copy content from other sources, you will be blocked from editing. Ask if you have any questions. Piguy101 (talk) 00:48, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do have a question, How do I put a book cover on wikipedia? It seems even though I cited from amazon, the bot won't let me.Webdevelopmentfellow (talk) 20:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Although I am not super familar with Wikipedia's image policy, you should check out these pages: Wikipedia:Uploading images and Wikipedia:Image use policy. You said that the book cover was your "own work," which was decided by an administrator (not me) to be untrue because you could not have possibly made the image yourself, so it was deleted under copyright violation. To use such an image, it must be used under a non-free license. Check out how this is handled at an example image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:To_Kill_a_Mockingbird.JPG Ask for any questions. Piguy101 (talk) 20:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the why the first image got deleted. But I changed the second image to "from other source" and referenced to that website, does that violate the rule? Webdevelopmentfellow (talk) 20:27, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Although I am not 100% sure, I believe it is still infringement. Looking at the licensing of the example image in the previous post, the cover image for To Kill a Mockingbird is acceptable because "This image is of book cover(s), and the copyright for it is most likely owned either by the artist who created the cover(s) or the publisher of the book(s). It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of book covers to illustrate an article discussing the book in question on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Other use of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, might be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information." Piguy101 (talk) 20:36, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since this is such a complex issue to do, I recommend that you wait until another editor does the proper work and adds this image. This way, you do not risk another copyright violation. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 20:37, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

However I still want to try and learn how to upload an appropriate image, I'll see what I can do. Thanks! Webdevelopmentfellow (talk) 20:40, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, even though you listed the site where you got the reviews from for Love Leadership:The New Way To Lead In A Fear-Based World and How the Poor Can Save Capitalism, copying the text verbatim is not allowed, unless there is clear evidence that the text is in the public domain. Since I am not sure what to do in this situation, I am reporting this incident and the two pages for administer review. Therefore, I am required to give you this notice:

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Piguy101 (talk) 20:49, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious image licensing

You put on Wikimedia [1], that the book cover was dedicated to the public domain. To do this, explicit proof is needed from both the author of the book and the publisher. That's fine, but proof is needed. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 20:56, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged the image on Commons for speedy deletion because of the lack of evidence that the image is under a free license. I have also uploaded a cover image, taken from Bryant's website, to the English Wikipedia as File:How the Poor Can Save Capitalism cover.png. That image is properly tagged as being non-free and in compliance with Wikipedia guidelines because it is a book cover shown in the article about a book. —C.Fred (talk) 21:04, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! Webdevelopmentfellow (talk) 21:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good. The image crisis has been averted. I will strike through it on the admin noticeboard page. Next, is dealing with the possibly non-free text in the two articles. Piguy101 (talk) 21:10, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Thanks for the effort, appreciate it! Webdevelopmentfellow (talk) 03:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Love Leadership: The New Way To Lead In A Fear-Based World

Proposed deletion of Love Leadership: The New Way To Lead In A Fear-Based World

The article Love Leadership: The New Way To Lead In A Fear-Based World has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kleuske (talk) 20:36, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Love Leadership: The New Way to Lead in a Fear-Based World

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Love Leadership: The New Way to Lead in a Fear-Based World, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 09:50, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]