User talk:Web kai2000/September 2006

Buses

Is it okay if i change the lead of the list? Even though Mrsteviec talked removal of non-TfL routes, many of the bus routes in London, not just those which cross the Greater London boundary, are non-tfl. What do you think? Simply south 15:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by "change the lead of the list", but if you're thinking of changing the name of the list, I believe it's a bad idea.sonicKAI 17:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

The lead of the list is the introduction to the list, not the name, sorry. Simply south 17:17, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's probably best to leave it the way that it is for now.--sonicKAI 17:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Stagecoach London and Transdev London

I need your help. All references to Stagecoach London need to be changed to either East London (bus company) or Selkent. Also, all references to London United and London Sovereign need to be changed to Transdev London. A list of what goes where can be obtained here. Thanks a lot. sonicKAI 20:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

I've completed what you requested. No problem. Is it okay? Simply south 10:51, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Sorry for the conflict we had in the past. I still dont like all the no-info stubs but I shouldn't have done what I done. No hard fealings? Lenny 11:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bus garages

I found an article on Fulwell Garage in category:London buses. It has a lot of information on the history of this garage, but I think that it would be more suited to the Travel London article.

Should I leave the page alone, or merge it with Travel London?--sonicKAI 15:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Travel London is quite long. If there is mostly repetition it could be merged in. But there is no harm leaving the article as is. --Mrsteviec 15:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I checked Travel London and there's already a link to the article. Do you think it's a good idea to create more articles on bus garages?--sonicKAI 15:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not for the sake of it, but it would be an effective way to split long articles about a single operator. --Mrsteviec 15:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks. --sonicKAI 16:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]