User talk:WebMaven2000

This user may have left Wikipedia. WebMaven2000 has not edited Wikipedia since 9 January 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, WebMaven2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 19:13, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Women of Psychology Project prefix:Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Women of Psychology Project prefix:Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. SwisterTwister talk 19:13, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/women of psychology. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:39, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Women of psycholoogy project

This message is being posted about the project page you created earlier, Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/women of psychology. In all honesty, it doesn't seem, to me, to be that bad of an idea. However, it does suffer from a few problems. The first of these is that the topic of the project is already covered by Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography and Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology. It might actually make more sense to perhaps contact one of the above groups to see if either has any interest in making it a task force, which is basically the same thing, but with less work involved. Also, in general, we try to see if there is sufficient interest in the idea to, basically, help ensure that the work involved in creation is useful. We do currently have a page at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals where individuals can propose projects or work groups to see if they have enough interest to be rolled out. It might not be a bad idea to list the page there, and, maybe, contact the relevant projects about the possibility of being a task force or work group. John Carter (talk) 01:11, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We also have Wikipedia:WikiProject Women scientists now, which would be a great fit. Djembayz (talk) 20:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Women of psychology

Hi, WebMaven2000. This project never really got off the ground, and there is a much more active project with a nearly identical name, Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Psychology. Following the recommendation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide#Other options, I have userfied it, placing it your user space. I did this with no prejudice against your reviving it at some future point, although it would probably make more sense to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Psychology. RockMagnetist(talk) 16:41, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- Mr X 🖋 23:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]