User talk:We are Chos3n

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chos3n (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chos3n and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! We are Chos3n, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/wikipedia-its-shrug-shoulders-attitude-bias-juliette-farrell

We are Chos3n (talk) 07:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chos3n (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Huon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chos3n and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Huon (talk) 02:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Chos3n, and I noticed that your username, "We are Chos3n", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Eteethan (talk) 04:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chos3n (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chos3n and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nu Gospel

A tag has been placed on Nu Gospel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Newly coined phrase, not in general use and with no claim to significance. Just because one band uses this term to describe their style does not merit an article.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gronk Oz (talk) 14:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chos3n (band)

The article Chos3n (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable music group. No evidence of notability other than their own web site.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Own website was Never listed . Links shared were MOBO daily newspaper and other reviewers . I copied format of similar artists listing only twitter

Nomination of Nu Gospel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nu Gospel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nu Gospel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gronk Oz (talk) 17:49, 27 November 2015 (UTC) Nu gospel is the way Chos3n list them self . It's also recognised by the BBC as a gospel sub genre . Why leave my article up for Nu Gospel and remove links . Surely if you leave article there means the edit I made was not promotional but genre identity musically[reply]

November 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because this account has been used only for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is against Wikipedia's policy: an account is for an individual, not a group. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising service.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:02, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Chos3n

Draft:Chos3n, a page which created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Chos3n and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Chos3n during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 04:02, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chos3n for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chos3n is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chos3n until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the deletion log moved

The deletion log has been moved We are Chos3n (talk) 07:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This link page has been deleted or moved by someone .I was forwarding my social media followers to appeal on my behalf . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chos3n

Sister Twister

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SwisterTwister

thus editor has ignored the previous editors comments about systemic bias and has ignored major factors that allow bands to list . Two major music awards made the page viable .

could it be diversity training would help . . Seems this persons idea is to delete is to some way win . . Why is that allowed. They have also blocked me so I can't defend the page.

Juliettefarrell@yahoo.co.uk

We are Chos3n (talk) 07:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We are Chos3n (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Your proposed new JFarrell (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I did not realise that starting an account with my usual log on would be considered advertising , Listing genre NU Gospel was not an attempt to advertise, it was the way some artists describe their style -

Decline reason:

Sorry, but an unblock request cannot be accepted when you are not logged in - please log in to this account and make a new request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:08, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]