User talk:Waynenoogen

Welcome!

Hello, Waynenoogen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

However, we cannot accept copyrighted content, such as City Seminary per WP:C - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 20:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Calvinism invitation

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Calvinism

The goal of WikiProject Calvinism is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Calvinism available on Wikipedia. WP:WikiProject Calvinism as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Calvinism, but prefers that all Calvinist traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

-- TimNelson 09:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Leben, a journal of Reformed Life

A tag has been placed on Leben, a journal of Reformed Life, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Lets drink Tea 20:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of City Seminary for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article City Seminary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City Seminary until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..

Nomination of Peter Humrickhouse for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Humrickhouse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Humrickhouse until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Waynenoogen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of edit re Elizabeth of Bohemia

Hi there, you have suggested that Princess Elizabeth as more involved than Queen Elizabeth in working for the restoration of the Palatinate. Please have a look at the introduction to her collected correspondance, and then decide whether you still think that is so. Queen Elizabeth (Consort of Frederick King of Bohemia) (2011), Akkerman, Nadine (ed.), The Correspondence of Elizabeth Stuart, Queen of Bohemia, Oxford: Oxford University Press</ref>

Somej (talk) 12:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It has been some years since this discussion, but thought you might take a look at this. https://leben.us/princess-palatine-elizabeth/

In the Reformed Church, we are rather jealous for Elizabeth’s reputation, and have always credited her as the “brains” of the family. The restoration of Heidelberg to the Elector Palatine would never have happened without her. My original suggested edit simply acknowledged that role. Waynenoogen (talk) 13:30, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Waynenoogen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Waynenoogen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:RCUS.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:RCUS.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 13:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I added the official logo of the Reformed Church in the United States taken from the denomination website. I received a notice I must add the source but don’t know how to do that. The source is RCUS.org Waynenoogen (talk) 06:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you consider the logo to be a copyrightable image? I would. If you agree, you not only need to provide the exact source from which you took the image, but you need to fill out the non-free content fair use justification for using it on Wikipedia. More details at: WP:NFC. (And you thought it would be easy!) — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, The problem is I cannot find where I actually append the copyright and use information. I am the Chair of the denomination Communications Committee and had this updated version of our logo created by a volunteer. We own it and created it, and it is copyrighted by inclusion on our RCUS.org website. I uploaded the updated image to Wikipedia and hit the copyright requirement, but there are no instructions as to precisely where and how to add the required info.

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Here’s the background:

I posted our denominational logo on Wikipedia and was asked to provide copyright info. Asked a question, and got this answer;

Do you consider the logo to be a copyrightable image? I would. If you agree, you not only need to provide the exact source from which you took the image, but you need to fill out the non-free content fair use justification for using it on Wikipedia. More details at: WP:NFC. (And you thought it would be easy!) — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 06:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Ok, The problem is I cannot find where I actually append the copyright and use information. I am the Chair of the denomination Communications Committee and had this updated version of our logo created by a volunteer. We own it and created it, and it is copyrighted by inclusion on our RCUS.org website. I uploaded the updated image to Wikipedia and hit the copyright requirement, but there are no instructions as to precisely where and how to add the required info. Waynenoogen (talk) 17:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You will want to use {{Non-free use rationale 2}} in order to explain how it's a non-free file but is being used for one specific purpose. For example, I have uploaded File:4BC radio logo.png and File:Mercury Filmworks logo 2022.png using these templates. Edit the page and replace the {{di-no source no license}} template with the non-free template (filling in the required info) and you should be good to go. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 18:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Christianity and abortion

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Christianity and abortion, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:35, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Christianity and abortion

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Christianity and abortion, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]