User talk:Wayiran/Archive 2

; Archives
	Archive 1; Archive 2; Archive 3; Archive 4; Archive 5; Archive 6; Archive 7; Archive 8; Archive 9; Archive 10;

Re: Hello

Dear Wayiran, thank you for your message and the link to the photograph. As for the discussion concerning the "Requested move", [1], unfortunately I was too late to contribute to it: the discussion turned out to have already been closed when I arrived at the discussion page. Kind regards, --BF 03:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Iran Pro League are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Genius 101^Guestbook 17:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't get what your comment means!? Did I make a general discussion!!!??? I know the rules well, and I know Wiki is not a forum and the talk pages are for the discussions aiming the improvement of article.

Thank you --Wayiran (talk) 17:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's my mistake, I think I chose the wrong template. I meant to reference your removal of a secetion at Talk:Iran Pro League. Thanks, Genius 101^Guestbook 17:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)][reply]

Ok, I removed that comment, because that was for 2007 and now the name officially has changed to "Persian Gulf Cup". I wanted to make a "requested move" for the article, but to avoid confusion, I removed that comment. If you want, delete this section. -Thanks --Wayiran (talk) 17:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All right; next time you might want to state something like that in the Help:edit summary. And for the template, using Twinkle, an automated tool, the "Talk Page as a Forum" template is right above the one I meant to use, so I misclicked. Thanks, Genius 101^Guestbook 18:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Wayiran. You have new messages at Genius101's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Genius 101^Guestbook 17:53, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Dear wayiran hi. Today I visited your user page and I was very proud to see it. I never bothered to make mine and I decided to make it today. However, I used one of your "perspolis" photos, in my page, but in different format, so it won't look the same. I wanted to tell you that if you are not happy, just let me know and I will remove it immediately. If you don't mind, then I would appreciate if you could show me how I can find more user themes (such as "this user is from I.R. IRAN), there should be a list that one can choose. I am looking for the one with the peacful use of nuclear energy. I appreciate if you could tell me how I can add it. Thanks Parvazbato59 (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's OK. Thanks for your message. You can get more images from here or here. I made this "nuclear energy" template for you. If you want you can change the wording. If there is any other idea for user templates supporting our IRIran, let me know.

-Doostdar --Wayiran (talk) 06:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Salam. Thank you wayiran! That is great! I definitely will. Movafagh bashi.Parvazbato59 (talk) 16:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Geber. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Khoi khoi 01:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was the first time in my wiki-life that I was getting blocked, but I wasn't aware that I've violated the rules. I knew the three-revert rule very well and it was because of my awareness that I reverted only TWO times on 9th of Feb and only TWO times on 10th of Feb (and not more). But my mistake was that the period between these two days was such long for me, that I didn't consider it to be less than 24 hours. Anyway thank you for following the rules and blocking me. --Wayiran (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, well actually the time that you reverted on both the 9th and the 10th were in the same 24 hours. But thanks for your cooperation. I've made a deal with Dy yol that if he/she stays away for the article for the remaining 31 hours and not edit war than he can be unblocked. Would you accept a similar deal? The point is to prevent users from edit warring, not to punish them. Khoi khoi 22:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do. I will not edit that article until my 31 hour ends. Thank you. --Wayiran (talk) 11:08, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]