User talk:Wavesurfer2013

Welcome!

Hello, Wavesurfer2013, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 02:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dirk Reynders

The article Dirk Reynders has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 02:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dirk Reynders

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dirk Reynders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 02:47, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had removed the speedy deletion tag based on this Google News Archive search. However, it does seem to me that there may be coverage here of a different person of the same name that is inflating and skewing the results. I'm going to propose for deletion, instead. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:21, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dirk Reynders

The article Dirk Reynders has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I have removed the speedy tag based on credible claims and what appeared to be decent Gnews search results. However, that Gnews search appears to have been skewed by a digital media manager of the same name, who is not the subject. I do not believe he meets WP:ANYBIO or WP:PROF, at this time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:24, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir,

I demand an explanation, you deleted my page that was created very objectif and sincere. I followed everything that was asked by the other editors. Why did you do that? Who makes you in charge of judging that page? I ask an explanation and the restore of the page, otherwise i will contact the head of wikipedia because this is not fair, i did everything that was asked, you never asked anything, you just deleted my page.

With kind regards,

Louis D.Wavesurfer2013 (talk) 13:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dirk Reynders for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dirk Reynders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirk Reynders until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who to turn to now, but my page is deleted and this is now fair, i did everything you asked for, when i see other pages with even no references on it, or links that aren't working than i think it is not fair for a objective and sincere page i made about that professor. I demand an explination?Wavesurfer2013 (talk) 10:25, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wavesurfer2013, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Wavesurfer2013! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]