User talk:Waterloo1974

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear Waterloo1974: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any dicussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! Rockpocket 07:53, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision

Hello Waterloo, and thankyou for your excellent Eurovision edits. You may want to join us at this WikiProject where we are attempting to improve coverage of this wonderful European icon (I'm from australia actually). REgards, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 05:35, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Europlanetarium-wit.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Europlanetarium-wit.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:ESC1956.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:ESC1956.GIF. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:05, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:ESC1975.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:ESC1975.GIF. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:ESC1998.GIF

I see that you created and uploaded the image ESC1998.GIF. Thanks a lot for that! However, there seems to be an error in the map. The Netherlands is yellow, which stands for "Countries who have participated in the past but don't this year." The Netherlands participated in the 1998 Eurovision Song Contest. Edsilia Rombley reached fourth place with the song "Hemel en Aarde." A ecis ^{No running, shouting or piddling in the shallow end} 00:28, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, I will correct it

Image copyright problem with Image:ESC1964.GIF

Thank you for uploading Image:ESC1964.GIF. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you created this image yourself, please look at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#For image creators, select one of those tags, and add it to the image. To do that, simply go to Image:ESC1964.GIF, click "edit this page", and add the appropriate tag. Be sure to remove the current tag indicating a lack of licensing!

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at User talk:Angr or at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —An gr 20:32, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ESC1961-63.GIF

Thank you for uploading Image:ESC1961-63.GIF. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you created this image yourself, please look at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#For image creators, select one of those tags, and add it to the image. To do that, simply go to Image:ESC1961-63.GIF, click "edit this page", and add the appropriate tag. Be sure to remove the current tag indicating a lack of licensing!

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at User talk:Angr or at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —An gr 20:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ESC1960.GIF

Thank you for uploading Image:ESC1960.GIF. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you created this image yourself, please look at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#For image creators, select one of those tags, and add it to the image. To do that, simply go to Image:ESC1960.GIF, click "edit this page", and add the appropriate tag. Be sure to remove the current tag indicating a lack of licensing!

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at User talk:Angr or at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —An gr 20:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ESC1959.GIF

Thank you for uploading Image:ESC1959.GIF. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you created this image yourself, please look at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#For image creators, select one of those tags, and add it to the image. To do that, simply go to Image:ESC1959.GIF, click "edit this page", and add the appropriate tag. Be sure to remove the current tag indicating a lack of licensing!

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at User talk:Angr or at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —An gr 20:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ESC1958.GIF

Thank you for uploading Image:ESC1958.GIF. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you created this image yourself, please look at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#For image creators, select one of those tags, and add it to the image. To do that, simply go to Image:ESC1958.GIF, click "edit this page", and add the appropriate tag. Be sure to remove the current tag indicating a lack of licensing!

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at User talk:Angr or at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —An gr 20:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, Tarek Elsetouhi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Curran (talk) 19:40, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FC Bayern Munich Taskforce

Would you like to join a FC Bayern Munich Taskforce at WikiProject Munich? Kingjeff 20:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lee DuMonde

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lee DuMonde, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.soapoperafan.com/days/characters/dumondes.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dora (singer)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dora (singer), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dora (singer). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Schuym1 (talk) 20:33, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of St James's Gate F.C.

The article St James's Gate F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

amateur sporting club, lacks 3rd party references, does not meet general notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 02:42, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		Football (soccer) barnstar
		Thanks for creating and expanding Königsberger STV. It's coming along wonderfully. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Barbara Dex Award

A tag has been placed on Barbara Dex Award, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:29, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The first article you created on this subject was deleted after this discussion, in which consensus was that the subject is not notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. Your new article was also nominated for deletion before it was found to contain substantially the same text; you did not alter the content in such a way as to demonstrate that it is notable in spite of community consensus. You may wish to review Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted? for some suggestions on the use of this material. Please note that an article on this subject should not be created unless you are able to demonstrate that it meets Wikipedia:Notability, which generally will require multiple reliable sources that are not generated by somebody involved with the article's subject. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:38, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Dex Award

Hi. The reason I was in favour of the deletion of the Barbara Dex Award article is because it fails the notability criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia: there are no independent reliable third-party sources which assert its notability. Simple as that. This is in contrast to your example of "Pullitzer Prize". It's not just that it's "more known": it's that there exist many independent third-party sources which assert how notable that prize is. It's nothing personal - just the way Wikipedia works. EuroSong ^talk 09:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Dex Award

Please don't edit AfD discussions after they have ended as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Dex Award - the discussion had been closed for nearly 4 years. Codf1977 (talk) 10:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Waterloo1974! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Tarek Elsetouhi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 02:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ESC1994.GIF listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ESC1994.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:26, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of José Barreiro (footballer)

Hello, Waterloo1974. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, José Barreiro (footballer), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want José Barreiro (footballer) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 17:32, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks

Thanks for adding the refs-that name could use a DAB I think, but yep thanks! Wgolf (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Waterloo1974. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Waterloo1974. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Annemieke Verdoorn

The article Annemieke Verdoorn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —C.Fred (talk) 01:11, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Waterloo1974. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:ESC2005.GIF

The file File:ESC2005.GIF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned, redundant to vectorized and independently-created File:ESC 2005 Map.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. House Blaster^talk 20:43, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]