User talk:Watbleby

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Kidding on the square, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see

If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pyra

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Pyra page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Whose Lime Is It Anyway?

A tag has been placed on Whose Lime Is It Anyway?, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.Treygdor 22:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Whose Lime Is It Anyway?

A tag has been placed on Whose Lime Is It Anyway?, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 22:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kugelmugel, you will be blocked from editing. Toohool 22:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will not continue to vandalize Wikipedia, yet I will still be blocked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by watbleby (talk • contribs)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Holy kiss. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Joshua ^{Say "hi" to me!}_{What have I done?} 02:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. (talk) 02:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

— Arthur Rubin | (talk) 02:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]