User talk:WangBob

April 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Keg stand has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Keg stand was changed by WangBob (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.990267 on 2013-04-25T04:51:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:51, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Wheeler (debate coach)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Scott Wheeler (debate coach) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:59, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 05:33, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WangBob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have used extremely researched studies to back up my claims. I also have 23 separate warrants, and you've dropped 27. Also, A. Interpretation- WangBob should be left alone and not unblocked B. Violation- Wikipedia has tried to block wangBob C. Standards 1. Education- we can't learn about WangBob's studies 2. Fairness- WangBob can't block Wiki, so Wiki shouldn't have to block WangBob. Allowing that would justify unrecipricol burdens. D. Voter- Education and Fairness

Decline reason:

Nonsense. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 06:23, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.