User talk:WalgreensOsorio

November 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Helfand has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Helfand was changed by WalgreensOsorio (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.922355 on 2013-11-15T21:29:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:29, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rodman

I've undone your edits to both Rodman and Rodman (disambiguation) because we don't change article titles on Wikipedia by copying and pasting text from one article to another. Doing that splits the article history which is needed for attribution and copyright purposes. Instead, use the process described at WP:RM to request a move from an old title to a new title. Thanks. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 22:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leanne Crow for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leanne Crow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leanne Crow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 21:19, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Luria's

Hello

I was looking at Luria's, an aritcle you just made, and instead of nominating it for deletion, I wanted to ask you if you could add more information to it and some sources, or it will be deleted.Staglit (talk) 21:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Luria's

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Luria's requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. IagoQnsi (talk) 21:30, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Janice M. Babiak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janice M. Babiak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janice M. Babiak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm 5 albert square. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Samsung because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Why did you attempt to add a protection template to the page? 5 albert square (talk) 19:48, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miracle City Mall

The article Miracle City Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 22:43, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Miracle City Mall

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Miracle City Mall, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Safiel (talk) 00:13, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:WalgreensOsorio regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 18:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can't claim to be an WP:Administrator when you aren't one – you need to remove that Userbox from your Userpage immediately... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Enrique (name)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Enrique (name), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://dictionary.sensagent.com/enrique/en-en/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:58, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Enrique

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Sunrise (talk) 00:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add to the standard message: if you want to have Enrique point to Enrique Iglesias, you should use a requested move. Thanks, Sunrise (talk) 00:15, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hilaria Baldwin

The article Hilaria Baldwin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Being married to someone does not cause nobility. Two appearances as herself is not a TV career.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 07:19, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Wendy's

An article that you have been involved in editing—Wendy's—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Mcenedella (talk)(contribs) 04:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]