User talk:Wakuljrv

October 2017

Hello, I'm Yosemiter. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ECHL, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yosemiter (talk) 01:35, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ECHL. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yosemiter (talk) 03:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nerd Wakuljrv (talk) 04:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on 1998 Sokcho submarine incident

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You are edit-warring on 1998 Sokcho submarine incident. WP:BRD clearly states what the required process is for a content dispute, arguing in edit summaries is not sufficient. Start a discussion on the Talk Page of why your change is justified and stop edit warring. Mztourist (talk) 03:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the idea here is reaching a consensus, then how come it's mostly you vs everyone else? Shouldn't this be up to the majority who believes that the fishing boat was sufficiently part of the event? Wakuljrv (talk) 05:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Rudka, Podkarpackie Voivodeship. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. SunDawn talk 10:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After looking at your page and seeing your amazingly based opinions, I completely respect your comment. Wakuljrv (talk) 10:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on After Romeo

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page After Romeo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]