User talk:Wakari07/Arch2

Simple definition articles

Hello Wakari07! I've noticed that some of the articles you've created recently consist of little more than word definitions. For example Bahiraṅga and Antaraṅga. Per WP:NOT: "Wikipedia is not a dictionary, or a usage or jargon guide." If these articles can't be expanded with encyclopedic content, they should be moved to Wiktionary instead, which is designed specifically for word definition articles. Let me know if you have any questions about this. Cheers. Kaldari (talk) 06:04, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They may look like stubs and simple definition articles, but they are concepts of certain philosophies. A student (of Yoga or a dravidian philosophy/religion or any consciousness science) may have good use for this reference at least as disambiguations or, at the very least, as redirects . While they may look as "little more than definitions" now and to the layman, i insist with the little argument i have, to note these (related) concept pairs: Bahiraṅga-Antaraṅga and Sabīja-Nirbīja as reference points rather than just as words. Wakari07 (talk) 14:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(copy to article's talk pages) Wakari07 (talk) 14:08, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the subject at the core of the two pairs mentioned, is Cetanā. Wakari07 (talk) 16:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will try to plant a bīja of this in WP:WikiProject Yoga one of these days. Oh my, I forgot: Thanks for your reply. Wakari07 (talk) 16:29, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would encourage you to group these words under higher concepts that can be developed into full encyclopedia articles. Alternately, you can use the {{Wiktionary redirect}} template to create a soft redirect to Wiktionary. Wikipedia articles generally don't include sections like "Antonym", "Transliterations", or "Etymology", as they are supposed to be about broad concepts, not individual words (although there are exceptions). These sort of entries are perfectly suited to Wiktionary though. Kaldari (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for the encouragement. I think the unified login works now, that helps ;) Wakari07 (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Obrigkeitsstaat.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 23:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Adventures of Alix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks for the message. Wakari07 (talk) 15:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Louis-Pierre Dillais

Hi, I'm Theopolisme. Wakari07, thanks for creating Louis-Pierre Dillais!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi there, thanks for the new article -- it seems to use confusing tenses/wording.. you may want to take a quick look. Thanks! Theo polisme 22:17, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Louis-Pierre Dillais, Wakari07!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please see WP:CITE to learn more about the correct formatting of footnotes avoiding the display of bare ULS. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thank you for your suggestion. Wakari07 (talk) 16:42, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis-Pierre Dillais, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Knack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:27, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Fixed. Wakari07 (talk) 16:39, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear power by country

Please see my proposal to upmerge Category:Nuclear power by country and subcategories (4) to Category:Nuclear energy by country Hugo999 (talk) 12:24, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Living Under Drones (academic study) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Living Under Drones (academic study) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living Under Drones (academic study) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Obrigkeitsstaat concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Obrigkeitsstaat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Obrigkeitsstaat

Hello Wakari07. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Obrigkeitsstaat".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Obrigkeitsstaat}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NIRAS (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on NIRAS (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PamD 08:37, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Louis-Pierre Dillais for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louis-Pierre Dillais is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis-Pierre Dillais until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 20:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whaling by japanese

the appropriate category for Japanese whaling would be "scandals and opinions". Therefore, it may be inappropriate for the news. Second possible match is "environment and ecology". Tech or science news should describe results or at least firm progress (experimental platform launch, for example), not the claims on progress commonly known to be false in case of Japanese whaling.

Did put it in "Environment and ecology" as per your suggestion. Wakari07 (talk) 13:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wakari07. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 6, 2017 edits on the current events portal page

Please familiarize yourself with the posting guidelines before you make any further edits on the page as your recent edits (like this and this one) shows your profound ignorance of them. Wingwraith (talk) 02:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What guidelines exactly do you mean? Wakari07 (talk) 03:00, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The guidelines that are located above the edit box when you edit the page. Also do not accompany your recent edit with this kind of comment again, it is false, idiotic and will attract administrative attention if you fail to cease and desist from making them. Wingwraith (talk) 03:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's still up on your accusation to substantiate why the illegal occupation of East Jerusalem would have any reason other than Land of Israel. I see none.~You~ are destroying information from the Wikipedia. Wakari07 (talk) 03:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's a separate issue from your interpretation of what Netanyahu was referring to when he described the announcement as a "historic landmark." Wingwraith (talk) 03:42, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I made my point. Where is the plan?Wakari07 (talk) 03:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Wingwraith (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

lol what's your point again? 04:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

"Les Jews sont faits", if you understand the joke. Wakari07 (talk) 20:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish Doctors for Human Rights

For Swedish Doctors for Human Rights in Portal:Current events/2017 December 8 see Portal talk:Current events/2017 December 8. X1\ (talk) 22:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC) copyWakari07 (talk) 22:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 8, 2017 edits on the current events portal page

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Wingwraith (talk) 22:54, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Wakari07 (talk) 22:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2017_December_9&diff=814732224&oldid=814722465 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --2600:8800:FF0E:1200:C57:B925:112F:96D (talk) 16:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The version as it stands now is OK for me. For a discussion on that, I refer you to the discussion proposal below. Thank you. Are you an admin? Wakari07 (talk) 16:24, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 9, 2017 edits on the current events portal page

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Murchison-Eye (talk) 10:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not engaged in a dispute since no argument was presented. Wakari07 (talk) 10:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 10 edits on the December 9, 2017 current events portal page

Significance, notability, metrics ... ?
Consensus decision-making criteria:

Number of adherents to Points of View for and against publishing the Vanity snippet.

For: me Wakari07 (talk) 11:55, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Against: 4

Other criteria? Someone? Sources? Wakari07 (talk) 12:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think four entities manage to fake a question mark. Wakari07 (talk) 12:38, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, User:PlanetDeadwing opines that my use of tenses would not be worth the bother of a comment. Wakari07 (talk) 13:06, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~I think User:Kiteinthewind thinks i'm a dork. Wakari07 (talk) 19:50, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I dare User:The Kip to point me to somewhere. Wakari07 (talk) 19:52, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And then the "ip storm". Wakari07 (talk) 19:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wait, there is also the explicit so-called "pass-gas" argument. Wakari07 (talk) 20:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Here Wakari07 (talk) 20:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Current events/2017 December 9. Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 19:38, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Portal:Current events/2017 December 9, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been asked, repeatedly, to stop including that news item. You have gone against the consensus of the community, on this issue, more than once. A report has been filed as a result. Stop. Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 19:45, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where is that report filed? Wakari07 (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Am I allowed a public process? Wakari07 (talk) 19:58, 10 December 2017 (UTC) What's the plan? Wakari07 (talk) 20:00, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Current events/2017 December 9. Myself, GWA88, (a bunch of numbers and letters), and Kiteinthewind have all independently reverted your edit. This counts as a four to one consensus that the news about how much TV Trump watches is not newsworthy. If you revert the page again, your edit will be construed as vandalism and you will be reported to an administrator. The burden of proof lies with the accuser, and in your initial accusation that this is a newsworthy event you have provided no proof and instead asked those who dispute the newsworthiness to prove it as not newsworthy (this is a logical fallacy).The Kip (talk) 20:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledged. Wakari07 (talk) 20:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Still you sound to me like a team of lawyers in Iran. Wakari07 (talk) 20:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using personal insults and callouts such as "I think User:Kiteinthewind thinks i'm a dork," "I dare User:The Kip to point me to somewhere," or "You sound like a team of lawyers in Iran." Continued callouts and/or insults will be regarded as a violation of Wikipedia's civility policy and will be dealt with accordingly. The Kip (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, now at least there's a thread. Sorry for calling you names. Have a good night too. Wakari07 (talk) 20:41, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Continued sarcasm and/or insults will be regarded as a violation of Wikipedia's civility policy and will be reported. I'd advise you tone it down. The Kip (talk) 21:05, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please... How old do you think I am? Wakari07 (talk) 03:24, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

35. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:29, December 14, 2017 (UTC)

You're almost there. But not quite. Wakari07 (talk) 20:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's as far as I'm willing to go. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:45, December 14, 2017 (UTC)

Still, older people also have their pride. Wakari07 (talk) 20:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then you gotta be a man, you can't let it slide. At least, that's what Rick Derringer thought in his thirties. Now he's changed his tune, and you gotta lend a hand. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:04, December 14, 2017 (UTC)

Are you implying this operation was/is a 69 by Trump wanting to buy a cover version of reality to show off to his cronies? Good luck with the Infowars, btw. I'm not sure if you guys will ever make it to reliable source here... But hey, good luck again. And also as an European, I agree with fighting for the rights of everyone! 21:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC) But I think Europe learned after World War II to try to avoid war to settle differences. I'm not sure if America can learn that lesson, I more hope that Europe doesn't forget it. Wakari07 (talk) 21:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw Iran, Trump and pride mentioned, so Hogan came to mind. I have nothing to do with Infowars. My country has its own polite brand of that stuff, and I don't work for it, either. But thanks for the luck. I'll put it to good use. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:17, December 14, 2017 (UTC)

Hogan. Lol. And a sweat lodge with a medicine man. Let's click on. Wakari07 (talk) 22:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tobacco, sage, sweet grass and cedar. Wrap it in a red, yellow, black and white pouch near your heart and presto! Infinite health. Ask your doctor. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:20, December 15, 2017 (UTC)

Hehe, I think he will say I'm a fool and ask me to stop smoking. So I think it's better not to see my doctor. But thanks for the research, it's appreciated. Wakari07 (talk) 13:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's not research. That's actually the sort of lesson I was taught as a kid (more or less, and alongside "normal" education). You shouldn't smoke any of that stuff if you want to live long or prosper, but as a scent, smudge or west-to-north campire offering to Grandmother Moon and your ancestors, broken cigarettes sure beat aspirin. You Europeans may be onto something with your MDMA, though. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:18, December 15, 2017 (UTC)

I guess we agree it's OK to take responsibility for our own health. I won't argue about my legal usage of cigarettes, if you please. Apart from that, I don't do hard drugs. Cheers. Wakari07 (talk) 19:26, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I smoke like a chimney, too. Only meant "you shouldn't" in a general way. Your body, your choice! InedibleHulk (talk) 20:00, December 15, 2017 (UTC)

Yes, and unity of body and mind too, if we don't want to end up as schizoids. Have a good day, it's time for me to go to sleep now. Wakari07 (talk) 20:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Wakari07 engaging in DE. NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:51, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Wakari07 (talk) 03:25, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The closure is archived here. Wakari07 (talk) 21:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:53, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is a problem where the internal affairs of one country become the internal affairs of an other. But hey, one question. Why 1932? Wakari07 (talk) 03:59, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That date was decided by the Arbitration Committee. The relevant section in the case which allowed discretionary sanctions to be imposed is here. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Sorry for the hassle. Thank you for Wikipedia. Wakari07 (talk) 10:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Wakari07 engaging in semi-violations of WP:Civility. The Kip (talk) 13:57, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So? Wakari07 (talk) 17:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC) What say the diffs? Wakari07 (talk) 20:54, 14 December 2017 (UTC) FYI: This. Wakari07 (talk) 21:15, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Current events/2017 December 13

Regarding this, please see WP:POINT. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, now reading. Wakari07 (talk) 13:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC) Undid, thanks for the intervention. Wakari07 (talk) 14:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kadovar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darwin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Wakari07 (talk) 21:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Autism" comment at ANI

I have to confess that I was put off by your comment on ANI that a disruptive editor was acting autistic. I think it undermines a spirit of constructive and harmonious editing. Can I ask that you avoid making similar comments in the future? Thanks. --Jprg1966 ^(talk) 19:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, that "editor" is an IP, nothing more than a machine that needs a boot if you wish. I am sincerely sorry to hurt the sensibilities in a way I certainly not intended. Certainly not meant to offend the autistic people. Indeed it is too much of a compliment for a bad machine to accuse it of human behaviour. Sorry again. Wakari07 (talk) 19:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted. --Jprg1966 ^(talk) 19:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 16 2018 edits on the current events portal page

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Wingwraith (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to propose the deletion of the blurb, since its subject ended up in a quagmire anyway. On the above warning, i replied on your talk page. Wakari07 (talk) 15:31, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of modern great powers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revisionism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since I can't determine what they mean, I've removed the link. Thanks for the suggestion. Wakari07 (talk) 09:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Current events

Hi, please don't simply copy content from news articles to the current events pages. See WP:COPYVIO. Thanks, ansh 666 19:34, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you suggest that i rephrase the contributions more or do you object against the content? I don't get what you object to. Wakari07 (talk) 19:37, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I insterted a new try at it. Wakari07 (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rephrase the content, don't simply copy and paste from the news article. The new version looks good. Thanks, ansh 666 20:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. Wakari07 (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taliban article

Make this kind of edit again and I will report you to ANI. Wingwraith (talk) 22:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Loo. Then sue me. You just did 3RR. I'm not impressed by empty threats. Also, you may reply on the subject instead of ad personam. Wakari07 (talk) 04:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You don't even know how 3RR works and it isn't an empty threat I repeat if you make another revision like that I will report you to ANI. Wingwraith (talk) 06:50, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's simple: you reverted three times my edits so your talk is meaningless for me. Please study chronology also.

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Halbe Zijlstra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, fixed. Wakari07 (talk) 13:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Current events/2018 March 5

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Current events/2018 March 5, you may be blocked from editing. Also famarilize yourself with WP:BRD. Wingwraith (talk) 09:08, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You must be on the wrong talk page. Try this one. Wakari07 (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:45, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Wingwraith (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Warren

Here are the sources on the subject: [1] Which ones would you consider open on her position? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:47, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to, by omitting her reaction, imply that her position doesn't change and that she'd consider it ludicrous to even talk about it. Wakari07 (talk) 17:49, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well the way the sources read... it looks like she declined the test. The reader can make their own judgement on what it means as there are two main reasons why this could be as talking points on both sides. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:52, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting question and I'm *not meaning to disrupt* your work. But why don't you propose one of those sources? I don't know and am not really interested in where and how she said it (again) exactly, so I really didn't fathom that the real news is that she declines... I thought that news was made last Tuesday in the Berkshire Eagle, as reported by the Jezebel blog?

Thank you for the process. IP solved it now i guess :-) Wakari07 (talk) 18:15, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I'm not at all convinced by what I read in CNN so I changed it to 'talk around' because I read 'push back' and not a clear and simple rejection. As I see it, it's just that she uses the stage time offered by the Mass. paper to present her point. Strange show to watch for a non-American, simply talking next to each other. Wakari07 (talk) 18:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And I learned that she said it in NBC's Meet the Press. So that's notable, thanks again. Wakari07 (talk) 18:32, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning, concludingly, that it would be news for me if she took up a challenge or said nasty things on the subject in public. Wakari07 (talk) 18:35, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited IGR J17329-2731, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phase change (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for prodding, bot, i changed the link to Transient astronomical event. Wakari07 (talk) 15:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PROD

Hi, I prodded the article Bahiraṅga, because the Transwiki process is no longer operational. Twinkle refuses to send you a notification so here is a manual one. Prince of Thieves (talk) 21:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Wakari07 (talk) 04:44, 15 March 2018 (UTC) Fixed. Wakari07 (talk) 20:39, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bahiraṅga

The article Bahiraṅga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Transwiki is deprecated, This is a dictionary definition rather than a encyclopedic topic. Fails WP:GNG and WP:DICTDEF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Prince of Thieves (talk) 21:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you asked^[2], and the thread is here: Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy#Transwiki. Prince of Thieves (talk) 20:39, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki is fixed. The term fits nicely in the "Category:Yoga" and among the 261 pages of "Category:Buddhist terminology". It can be seen as (part of) essential concepts used in source texts written in Sanskrit (the root language used for this lemma) and Pali and many other languages (eg. Hindi, Tibetan, Mandarin, Japanese, Burmese, Vietnamese, Thai, ...). Wakari07 (talk) 21:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mandarese people

Show a source that proves you claim otherwise do not edit the page also mandarese are majority muslim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsi786 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on the article's talk page. It's up to you to provide reliable sources for your claim. Wakari07 (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

When indenting your comments on talk pages, please use one more : mark than used in the preceding comment, so that the discussions are easier to follow, thanks. L.R. Wormwood (talk) 20:44, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for welcoming me. But I'm much older here and have way more edits. Wakari07 (talk) 00:47, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not welcoming you, I’m asking you to indent your comments properly. L.R. Wormwood (talk) 08:53, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, no. You should learn about indents. Wikipedia:Indentation and look for the "me three" example, yust under "me too"... You still have lots to learn. Wakari07 (talk) 09:05, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your indentation still looks fairly random to me, but I'll assume it follows some pattern. L.R. Wormwood (talk) 10:52, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your effort, and i WP:Assume good faith likewise. Wakari07 (talk) 12:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HEY! Wake up, your use of indents is atrocious. Quit arguing with people who are having a problem with your editing and take the quite good advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.3.17 (talk) 19:40, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anon, not here. Wakari07 (talk) 03:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

If you keep on soaping and making PA's you are going to get a block.Slatersteven (talk) 13:24, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How personal? I thought with PA you meant professional audio. Am I personal by calling the hounders a Pentagon ISO squad? What is the specific issue here please? Or is it a general? Wakari07 (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you are that experienced an edd as you claim above you should know what PA means in the context of Wikipedia, as you do not please read wp:NPA and wp:agf. As to what I am calling out [[3]] in which you accuse other users of being agents of governments and of censorship, this is a violation of AGF and no personal attacks. You comment on content not users motives or actions. This [[4]], in effect saying others users are trying to waste your time and effort (you could always walk away you know?). But the clinchers is this [[5]] where you say another users does not think (please do not play the innocent "but I did not say it I asked a question" card). If you carry on like this you will get taken to ANI, and there is no way you will not get as block. Stop commenting on others users on talk pages that are not about them.Slatersteven (talk) 13:51, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, sorry, my sending thanks to you was honest though. Wakari07 (talk) 13:54, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, it does not matter what people off wiki think about us, only our policies and our consensus matters. Please do not soapbox about censorship or what the Russian war machine might think. Argue only from the point of view of policy, (Wikipedia's policy, not anyone elses) and only discus the subject under discussion, not linked or ancillary articles or subjects.Slatersteven (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ARBPIA DS alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Icewhiz (talk) 13:21, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see, but it's a personal opinion to catalogue Yaser Murtaja in the above category. One could see his life and death in other contexts too. Wakari07 (talk) 14:13, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that some ARBPIA rules - for instance 1RR - apply regardless of there being a warning on the page.Icewhiz (talk) 14:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, thanks for the notice. There is also no problem currently on the page. Wakari07 (talk) 14:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, from the Portals WikiProject...

You are invited to join the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system...

The Portals WikiProject was rebooted on April 17th, and is going strong. Fifty-nine editors have joined so far, with more joining daily.

We're having a blast, and excitement is high...

Our goal is to update, upgrade, and maintain portals.

In addition to working directly on portals, we are developing tools to make portals more dynamic (self-updating), and to make building and maintaining portals easier. We've finished two tools so far, with more to come. They are Template:Transclude lead excerpt and Template:Transclude random excerpt.

Discussions are underway about how to further upgrade portals, and what the portals of the future will be.

There are plenty of tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too).

With more to come.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 23:45, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya from the current event Portal, where you made several edits today the 25th May, and removed the GDPR story; as it is ongoing, could your improvements include this report that the Los Angeles Times is having technical problems online? (https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/gdpr-us-news-websites-la-times-offline-chicago-tribune-new-york-daily-a8368556.html) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.161.163.165 (talk) 11:25, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems legit. Working on it. Wakari07 (talk) 11:27, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There was fair warning in the media that widespread disruption would take effect today, so thanks for your timely improvements.126.161.163.165 (talk) 11:41, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done, still working on the spam and meme thing. Wakari07 (talk) 11:42, 25 May 2018 (UTC) I think I'm done now. The Guardian source was yesterday's news. Wakari07 (talk) 11:46, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for creating Félix Tshisekedi Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:28, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 18:04, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

Hater?

not a hater, just a fan of using high-quality sources :) 107.5.200.111 (talk) 03:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Wrong comment. But the edit stands, and the blurb also. Wakari07 (talk) 12:14, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Wingwraith (talk) 01:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledge that boath of US are warned. Wakari07 (talk) 07:42, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For your tireless edits on continually adding and fixing up news items to Portal:Current events. Nixinova T C 20:04, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Current events/2018 June 20 edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Wingwraith (talk) 23:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weren't we both warned twice already? Why don't you talk first on the talk page you *don't* link to? I suppose you mean this? Wakari07 (talk) 09:54, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]