User talk:WHATaintNOcountryIeverHEARDofDOtheySPEAKenglishINwhat

Welcome

Hello WHATaintNOcountryIeverHEARDofDOtheySPEAKenglishINwhat, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Otolemur crassicaudatus Good luck, and have fun. --Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:43, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Units of measure

Thanks for the edits to the Jeep Forward Control article to spell out the units of measurement. According to the MOS:NUM guidelines: "the main units may also be abbreviated in the main text after the first occurrence". Thus, there is no need to spell out units within the conversion template in the sentence directly following the one that has the first occurrence of "inches" in the main text of the article.
Your addition of CID equivalency fir the engines in the Jeep Wagoneer article is a considerable effort. However, it would be simpler to use the automatic CID and L conversions formulas, as well as the other auto-specific templates that are available here Category:Automotive conversion templates. I went ahead and updated the engine information.

Thanks — CZmarlin (talk) 02:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inches are the only one I'm personally not comfortable with abbreviating in the text of a sentence, but I guess it's just me personally so I'll leave them alone in the future. Yes, I did find the conversion templates and they are useful. Thanks WHATaintNOcountryIeverHEARDofDOtheySPEAKenglishINwhat (talk) 17:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

redlinks and interwiki

For the edits you made on D. B. Cooper please note:

WP:REDLINKS are okay; they need not be removed
An interwiki link is not a simple wikilink, as you noted, but a link to another language Wikipedia, or one of the sister projects such as wikibooks, wikisource, wiktionary, etc. —EncMstr (talk) 20:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auto article edits

Greetings. Some of the edits you've been making recently are problematic, because they're not in accord with the content and format standards we adhere to in the auto project. For example, please stop changing engine displacements from in³ to CID. Per applicable convention, the correct unit is in³. Per the same convention, we express an engine's displacement in cubic inches only if the engine was originally so engineered and marketed. Please read the linked convention, which contains helpful usage notes and links to work-saving templates you might not be aware of.

Also, while your augmentation of the engine data in several articles' infoboxes is certainly unique and well formatted, it is also out of accord with the consensus on what does and doesn't go in the infobox. We don't try to present detailed engine specifications in the infobox, because trying to do so crams the infoboxes with too much content — even with hidden tabs — and such details are best and most easily presented in the article text itself. We don't include fuel economy information in the infobox, because of the plethora of different fuel economy rating systems (and even if we did include fuel economy, it wouldn't be an engine parameter — engines don't get any particular fuel economy, vehicles do). The automobile infobox template page contains helpful guidelines on how best to use each field in the infobox.

Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is a coöperative, consensus-based project, and avoid changing the content and/or format of articles in a manner that goes against the conventions developed through the evolving consensus. Of course, everyone is welcome and encouraged to participate in the consensus-building process — including you — so if you feel the provisions of a convention are somehow in error, by all means speak up about it. First check to see if the matter you have in mind is already under discussion, and if not, go ahead and open the topic on the relevant talk page.

Thanks for editing coöperatively. —Scheinwerfermann (talk) 14:54, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:47, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Burma to Myanmar - new 2015 poll

You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:09, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your photo

Where was this photo taken? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:51, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhere cold, very cold. WHATaintNOcountryIeverHEARDofDOtheySPEAKenglishINwhat (talk) 15:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, WHATaintNOcountryIeverHEARDofDOtheySPEAKenglishINwhat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, WHATaintNOcountryIeverHEARDofDOtheySPEAKenglishINwhat. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page United States Border Patrol, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 03:57, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]