User talk:Vulea

Styles and methods of decision-making

Hello! I have suggested that your article be merged with Decision making in order to avoid having researchers look for two seperate pages covering the same topic. (aeropagitica) 17:13, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Русское безрубежье

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Русское безрубежье to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Prestonmag (talk) 18:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Quantum genre

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Quantum genre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dolescum (talk) 02:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Quantum genre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quantum genre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum genre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dolescum (talk) 18:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Vulea. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Quantum genre, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A word of advice

It looks as though you may have been editing without logging into your account, using at least two IP addresses. If so, then I would advise you not to continue doing so. Editing both from your account and anonymously on the same topic runs the risk of giving other editors the impression that you are trying to appear to be different people, so as to give a spurious impression of independent support for your views, or to evade Wikipedia policies. If people get that impression, it will reduce the weight they give to anything you say, and may even lead to your being blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:08, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About your advice

Thank you for your advice! I don't edit without logging into account; so if you noticed a different IP addresses, unless you traced them to my account, I would advise not to suspect cheating but rather use your logic and assume it may be another user who access the article for editing.