User talk:Vugar69

Welcome!

Hello, Vugar69! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! DVdm (talk) 19:43, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Signatures

Please sign your talk page messages at the end of the messages. See wp:SIGHOW. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 19:43, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User talk:kelapstick, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:40, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 21:11, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute, Dear KrakatoaKatie Please Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vugar69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Vugar69 (talk) 19:39, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Dear Wikipedian, I am writing to disput blockage my account "Vugar69" and my IP by user KrakatoaKatie for the following reason : clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia. The block has no expiry set. I entered into Wiki`s Nobel oil group page "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Oil_Group" to help users of Wiki to put facts in order. My addresses was polite, neutral, up to the point and has proof backed by links. Please see talk page -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nobel_Oil_Group . What is very important is that a one of the users put discriminatory, libellous and sounding like offensive line on real person which has an impact on his reputation. This line came from user Redzed9876 – “ Its founder and declared 100% owner, Nasib Jabbar Oglu Hasanov, has no oil industry education or energy background prior to establishing the company and immediately getting choice contracts from domestic and international government and private corporations”. References 9 and 10 which should have backed this statement doesn`t work. User Redzed9876 take this statement from nowhere and this is untrue and discriminatory statement which exists on Wiki web-site up to now. While I tried to motivate user Redzed9876 to delete unsupported information I was blocked by KrakatoKatie. Now we have strange situation. While I had tried to correct information on Wiki and to make my first contribution I was blocked by KrakatoaKatie but the discriminatory information still is on and user Redzed9876 doesn`t correct own untrue (because it has no proof) input. I am kindly asking all of you to consider this issue and I would be grateful if you were able to unblock my account which was blocked unfairly. I am looking forward to hearing from you and other editors asap. NB: I have checked the list of active blocks. Block is listed Regards Vugar69[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to have an acute case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. You were warned to stop hounding other editors, and you persisted. Wikipedia editing does not happen in realtime, and content disagreements are resolved via community consensus.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Newcomer, Didn`t know rules, please Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vugar69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am newcomer and didn`t know Wiki rulesVugar69 (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Seems to be false. And sockpuppetry after the block doesn't help. only (talk) 18:10, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'd like to offer my two cents: the user actually knew the Wikipedia rules well enough, and being affiliated with Nobel Oil Group, which has extremely high Wikipedia editing activity for over a year now, he knew enough to go to several talk pages, from users to admins to admin board, to write his allegations and provide various links. This requires a degree of sophistication, knowledge and skills. So to claim now that user Vugar69 didn't know what he was doing is a bit disingenuous. Redzed9876 (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vugar69 (talk) 20:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Two cents are disruptive and have got teeth. Rahmatold (talk) 20:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)User should be unblocked. Redzed9876 - campaigner[reply]

Vugar69 (talk) 10:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)It is not multiple accounts by one. it is using one internet access by different individuals. Is it still sockpuppetry?[reply]

On Wiki rules

Vugar69 (talk) 22:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Oil_Group Section - Controversy and criticism- "Several independent media outlets in Azerbaijan, Romania where is evidence? and elsewhere where is evidence? have raised question where is evidence? on the actual real ownership and beneficiaries of the company, since they are concealed where is evidence? from the public eyes. Despite getting multi-million dollar government contracts and choice pieces where is evidence? of oil and gas blocks in the Caspian Sea, the shadowy where is evidence?[22]dead Nobel Oil Group has a non-transparent ownership structure and its relationship with the Azerbaijan government is unclear. [23]dead [24]dead[25]dead"[reply]

This part of Controversy and criticism were created by Redzed9876 and still exists up to now. Does it go well with Wiki rules?

Comment: Removing talk page access seems appropriate, for a sockmaster. Mlpearc (open channel) 22:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vugar69 (talk) 23:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)What about freedom of expression on my own page, Mlpearc ?[reply]