User talk:Redzed9876

Please leave a message.

Welcome

Hello, Redzed9876, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Redzed9876, good luck, and have fun. – | Uncle Milty | talk | 20:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Redzed9876! Thank you for your contributions. I am NottNott and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! NottNott talk|contrib 15:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redzed9876 didn`t reply

Dear Redzed9876 , I am still waiting your reply. You did wrong input — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vugar69 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen any "wrong input". I've simply cited relevant independent sources from different countries, different media. They all open, all are readable. Redzed9876 (talk) 18:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Redzed9876 your message dated 18:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC) indicates clearly that you don`t read my reply with proof and links and this is irresponsible action from your side. Please, reply on what was wrote on talk page of Nobel Oil group, check links and back with your reply. Regards. Vugar69 (talk) 19:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redzed9876 is not reliable and is irresponsible user. I put the links to the sources which show that he is not right but Redzed9876 is not able to accept this. He is confusing readers. Every editor and admin can investigate logs and it will be clear. Vugar69 (talk) 19:17, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Redzed9876 , I am still waiting your reply on why you are doing wrong input? You don`t have any sources for such statements. You don`t have sources. Burman newspaper is confusing facts. You know this but are still doing wrong inputs. Please read this http://www.irrawaddy.com/burma/burmas-frontier-appeal-lures-shadowy-oil-firms.html and carefully read this http://www.reuters.com/article/myanmar-oil-table-idUSL3E8C63AA20120106 . If you don`t see confusing facts then how you can write article on Wiki? Vugar69 (talk) 19:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vugar69 (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Dear Redzed9876 I am asking you kindly to remove your wrong input. It has not links. It is confusing readers. Again, please remove your wrong input.[reply]

Vugar69 (talk) 20:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Dear Redzed9876 you should have seen "wrong input" because you have simply cited wrong irrelevant unverified sources and media. They don`t open and are not opened. The article on Burma newspaper is wrong. Proof here http://www.reuters.com/article/myanmar-oil-table-idUSL3E8C63AA20120106 . Also please do read talk page of Nobel Oil Group. You will find proof. You must remove your wrong input in the sake of readers.[reply]

The one confused here is you, Vugar69. Firstly, what is your interest in the article? Do you work for the company or are you a paid editor?

Second, you are not concerned with just one "Burma" reference - you and your friends have been removing everything. So please don't tell me that you are only concerned about the Burma article.

Third, your company might not have any contracts in Burma - that's not the point. The point is that the Burma article's publisher and journalist clearly thinks that Nobel Oil Group is a shadowy corporation. And that's not just their opinion. Thus, the reference is absolutely correct, as we do not discuss any Burma contracts, but the judgement and opinion about the Nobel Oil Group. Redzed9876 (talk) 14:22, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for fighting the good fight on that entry -- clear troll activity to suppress any critical mention of that company Hundnase (talk) 14:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a soapbox

Please read our WP:SOAPBOX, WP:SPA and WP:NOR policy links. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:34, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Redzed9876 (talk) 21:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]