User talk:VoicNoir

Welcome!

Hi VoicNoir! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 00:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glow Services Corp (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CNMall41 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References must be in-depth about the company and meet WP:ORGCRIT. Also, having an entire section about the board of directors is only there to serve the company, not encyclopedia readers. Wording like - "embedded services tech company that provides white label technology platforms for large companies in the OEM and Telecom & Media sector" - shows that submitter has a likely COI and would recommend reading WP:COI and WP:PAID and make disclosure if applicable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glow Services Corp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 00:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VoicNoir! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 00:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Glow Services Corp has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Glow Services Corp. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:43, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing

Hello VoicNoir. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:VoicNoir. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=VoicNoir|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 13:43, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there , I do not work for Glow or being payed by them. I know of the product and thought Id write a page on them as they didn't haven when I tried to find more on them - as I have an interest in innovations in fintech - I did ask someone who uses their product about them and they where able to give me more info, maybe too much such a board of advisors etc which is why its sounds in depth . I understand that this might be too much as Im new to wiki pages. I did the technical research myself - Ie what the device does and what tech it uses as I have an interest in this technology- As someone who I think I can write I decide to create a page. VoicNoir (talk) 14:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't work for the company, why did you upload their logo as your own work? — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:39, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A mistake on my part - just uploaded from a screen grabbed on my Mac - and didn't even notice Id put it down as own work - I can trace the original person if this helps and give credit - if that helps. 2A00:23C8:CB8:301:9C2C:D5EF:E075:A653 (talk) 14:44, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glow Services Corp (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glow Services Corp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:06, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Glow Services Corp

Hello, VoicNoir. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Glow Services Corp, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Glow Services Corp

Hello, VoicNoir. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Glow Services Corp".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:27, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]