User talk:Vlaich

Welcome!

Hello, Vlaich, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Camilo Him, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 23:42, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Camilo Him

The article Camilo Him has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. References lack independence or are trivial.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 23:42, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Camilo Him for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camilo Him is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camilo Him until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 15:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Camilo Him

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Camilo Him requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 02:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Big Shows

The article Big Shows has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable photo show by non-notable photographer. Lacks Independent, non-trivial support.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 03:26, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy... With all due respect, I have to assume that reddogsix knows much better about the fashion world than top NY based fashion designers: Anna Sui, Carolina Herrera, Ralph Rucci, Carmen Marc Valvo, Rebecca Minkoff, Dennis Basso, Lubov Azria, Zang Toi, Naeem Khan, Vivienne Tam, Reem Acra, Custo Dalmau and Mara Hoffman or celebrities: Karlie Kloss, Sandra Bernhard, Karolina Kurkova, Selita Ebanks, Eve, Nana Meriwether, Sean Young and Nigel Barker... not to mention Lincoln Center and Mercedes-Benz Fashion week.

Talkback

Hello, Vlaich. You have new messages at Reddogsix's talk page.
Message added 21:16, 5 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

reddogsix (talk) 21:16, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Big Shows for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Shows is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Shows until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 05:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vlaich. Strongly suggest you merge Big Shows into the biography quickly. Together these might survive as a merged bio, but Big Shows certainly will not pass WP:GNG on its own. Good luck. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:20, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi... so you suggest keeping bio (after adding content about big shows). then deleting big shows... correct?

Vlaich (talk) 21:46, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think you can merge the Big Shows article into the Bio and then bio is likely to survive AfD In ictu oculi (talk) 09:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed them )

Vlaich (talk) 10:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Camilo Him (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Elle, Vogue, Balmain and Vanity Fair

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Vlaich. You have new messages at Dewritech's talk page.
Message added 21:16, 18 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dewritech (talk) 21:16, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Vlaich. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Camilo Him for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camilo Him is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camilo Him (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theredproject (talk) 19:37, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018 uncivil comment at Camilo Him AFD

Please do not call other editors trolls and make personal attacks as you did at the AFD for Camilo Him.96.127.242.226 (talk) 05:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you carry on not only will the article get AFD'd but you will get a block. Please read wp:npa. Wp:V and wp:n.Slatersteven (talk) 15:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You also look very much like a wp:spa with a possible wp:COI, are you in fact connected to Camilo Him in some way?Slatersteven (talk) 15:10, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slatersteven Do you have a reference for that comment? LOL! No, I am not connected to Camilo Him. Is that a Conspiracy Theory of yours now? LOL! But I tell you what, I was in the organization involved in inviting Camilo Him to NEW YORK FASHION WEEK at The Lincoln Center! How about that? And we saw it all!

We live it, you dream it… chained to the washing machine from the basement at your mom’s home! DELETE and BLOCK me… see if I care. Ooops maybe I have other articles under a different name! WoW

Yet all you seem to have done is edit his article.Slatersteven (talk) 15:30, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And as far as I can tell from what little I have found he was not invited to New York Fashion Week, he held an exhibit held at the same time. I can find no sources that say it was in any way affiliated with it.Slatersteven (talk) 15:32, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slatersteven Don’t hurt yourself thinking about it. REALLY!

In fact, If you are smart enough you will realize there was an article about BIG SHOWS first until it was suggested to do it under the photographer! Genius… NOT!

You can’t find any sources because you are not on the very inside. HELLO?

Get real! Does anybody really care what FAKE NEWS PURVEYORS think? Wikipedia obviously has been infiltrated by a troll farm!Vlaich (talk) 15:48, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 16:36, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]