User talk:FloralContributor8192

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hare (programming language) (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hare (programming language) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hare (programming language), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 12:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FloralContributor8192! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 12:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FloralContributor8192 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 95.141.22.206. This is my residential IP address. My internet provider is G.Network. I currently cannot use an alternative connection. FloralContributor8192 (talk) 13:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed webhost. You can connect to it yourself by clicking here. Yamla (talk) 19:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

FloralContributor8192 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 95.141.22.206. This is _not_ a "web host". The webpage Yamla referred to is simply port 80 being open and forwarded on my computer. The page just says "hi". I will note that this is completely unrelated to the original reason to block the IP, which apparently was that it was being used by a web hosting service/company. Would you like me to close this port, which is otherwise not used for anything anyway? Are Wikipedia editors not allowed to have port 80 open with nginx serving a .html file on their own desktop PC? FloralContributor8192 (talk) 19:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

It looks like this range was reassigned (to g.network) at some point after my block. I'll unblock in a second, apologies for the inconvenience. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:18, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]