User talk:Visnvoisnvo

Welcome!

Hello, Visnvoisnvo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Maybe Love Will Change Your Mind. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 13:29, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fleetwood Mac

Thanks for creating all these articles about Fleetwood Mac singles, you're doing a great job. Remember notability though, for example, I don't think "Sunny Side of Heaven" is notable enough for an article. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 15:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey it's me. I think that it should because it was on an album that's sold a million copies in the U.S. and it's a very good song. It's not doing anyone harm is it?

No, but it still has to pass the notability requirements. Otherwise you could write an article about nearly all Fleetwood Mac songs. Basically a song has to be a single (A-side) and it has to have charted somewhere as a single. Or, you have to find enough information and sources about it to write a much longer article. Bretonbanquet (talk) 15:14, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well I'm not going to do every song (even though every Beatles song has a wiki page), I will only do the songs from now on that are singles or that I can write a long article about.

Yeah, the Beatles are supposedly a "special case" although a lot of people argue about that. I see you've linked "Thoughts on a Grey Day" - sorry, that's nowhere near fit for a stand-alone article. Any reliably-sourced info you can find (not forum posts!) should go into Bare Trees. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 15:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay but guess what! That "forum post" is more reliable then half the things on wikipedia, go look at the post first it is reliable. "Thoughts on a grey day" will have more then the fourm post, please wait until I'm done typing. Please do not delete my work, i'm not doing much more after this and besides, am I wasting internet space? Is it wrong information? No! I don't see what the problem is. TOAGD will be longer then other song pages I made. Thank you.

I know most of the guys on that forum, and while they are posting in good faith, they make mistakes. Trying to find someone from the past is a lot harder than they think. I think it's maybe 50/50 that this woman is who they think it is. I'm not going to delete anything you do, but someone else might, and I can't stop them. It's not a question of internet space, it's more a question of Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and some people enforce them very strictly. I'm waiting for TOAGD but there really isn't much information out there, and it should probably go into the album article anyway. Bretonbanquet (talk) 15:49, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I PM'ed him for details and he proved it is legit.

You PMed who? Wikipedia needs a lot more than someone's say-so. I saw the article, but I doubt it will stay for long. Why have you got all the members of Fleetwood Mac under personnel? There's no evidence any of them were present. You have John McVie doing vocals. It's really shaky, sorry. Bretonbanquet (talk) 15:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Read the book and come back to me okay? They were all there and at the end they say good job and laugh okay? I PM'ed someone on The Ledge.

I've read the book. The male voice at the end is not a member of the band. Someone on the Ledge is not a reliable source. Could be anybody. Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fireflies (Fleetwood Mac song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fireflies (Fleetwood Mac song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fireflies (Fleetwood Mac song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 15:17, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why! It was a top 60 hit!

W

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mirror, Mirror (Stevie Nicks album)

added a link pointing to Jay Ferguson

Stevie Nicks discography

added a link pointing to C'mon C'mon (song)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Freedom (Fleetwood Mac song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freedom (Fleetwood Mac song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom (Fleetwood Mac song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RichardOSmith (talk) 10:03, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not right. There is nothing wrong with it. I'll add a few sources if it makes you happy. Please do not delete it Why are you guys picking at everything I do.

This is not personal and there is no wish to discourage you from contributing. However, rightly or wrongly, Wikipedia does not want articles on every song ever. When selecting songs about which to create articles, WP:NSONGS will provide guidance. RichardOSmith (talk) 12:58, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there is no reason why you cannot make your case for inclusion at the AfD and I would encourage you to do so. RichardOSmith (talk) 13:00, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not doing every song!!! Only the notable ones. Freedom was the only time that another person played percussion on a studio Fleetwood Mac song AND the only one that was co-written by Michael Campbell.

Ok, but whether that's notability or trivia is subjective. Wikipedia has a clear and straightforward definition: something is notable if there is non-trivial independent coverage of it in multiple reliable sources. If you can reference such sources then the article should be saved. RichardOSmith (talk) 14:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have just taken time away from me. I'm no robot. You need to stop deleting everything I do and start adding things to it. You're to lazy to help me out and add some more references that you just have to hit that delete button.

July 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thoughts on a Grey Day. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FThoughts_on_a_Grey_Day&type=revision&diff=670826381&oldid=670396285 RichardOSmith (talk) 15:35, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Illume (9–11) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Illume (9–11) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illume (9–11) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RichardOSmith (talk) 15:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Deleting Every Thing I DO!!!!!! This takes me a long time and you're throwing out my work!!! Do you have nothing better to do???????

July 2015

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Visnvoisnvo. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. [1] RichardOSmith (talk) 18:35, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joe Seerg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Seerg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Seerg (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of The Dealer (Stevie Nicks song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Dealer (Stevie Nicks song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dealer (Stevie Nicks song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:14, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Street Angel (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Michael. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

Hello Visnvoisnvo, I thought I'd leave you a message as opposed to templating you with a discouraging message. First of all, you seem like a keen editor, which is always great to see on here, thankyou for your contributions, they're appreciated. I see that many, many, many articles you create end up being deleted or redirected, and I thought I'd explain why. It's not because editors are too lazy to contribute, and deleting is an easier option, it's nothing personal, and it's not because people don't like new pages. The reason is that most, if not all of the articles you create fail notability guidelines. Some of these guidelines are general to all articles, while some are specific to songs or albums. These guidelines are in place to keep chaotic, very minimal articles from flooding the site. I kindly ask you to read the guidelines I've linked before creating more articles. Should you make many more articles like you've made in the past, I'll have no choice but to contact admins and ask them to revoke your creation privileges. All the best, Azealia911 _talk 02:08, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reconsider Me (song):

Can you check who wrote this? Infobox and cats don't match. Also I have added a "uncategorized" tag to Fireflies. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 18:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Please see this deletion discussion. --Richhoncho (talk) 23:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Dance (Fleetwood Mac album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silver Springs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammed's Radio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammed's Radio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed's Radio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Azealia911 _talk 11:04, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fleetwood Mac Rumours

Please don't remove the valid list of studios at Rumours (album). These can be seen at the Mojo magazine article and in the Ken Caillat book.

Also, don't add the assertion that Nicks sequenced all the tracks. Nobody else confirms this statement by Nicks. For instance Ken Caillat says he had a small part in the track order. And Leah Furman writes about how the band decided against one of Nicks' favorite tracks, substituting "I Don't Want To Know" for the longer "Silver Springs" which Nicks very much wanted to have on the album. So Nicks did not "sequence" the tracks on the album, at least not alone, and not with any kind of veto power. Basically, it was Mick Fleetwood's final decision, since he was the band leader. Binksternet (talk) 18:28, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure?

According to your contributions this song was released as a single 5 years before it was recorded. This does put a question mark on all your contributions and I thought you might like to prove that you are contributing to Wikipedia responsible. Thanks. --Richhoncho (talk) 17:31, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What song are you talking about? That might have been a mistake. - Visnvoisnvo 15:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Say You Will (Fleetwood Mac song), but that's the only one I spotted. --Richhoncho (talk) 21:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Plus uncategorized and unreferenced. Deletion fodder...--Richhoncho (talk) 21:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Unreferenced? Check again. It says recorded 2002, released 2003. Where are you looking??? - Visnvoisnvo 15:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Look again, and at the categories. --Richhoncho (talk) 22:12, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow big deal. Fixed. Thanks for pointing that out.

Imperial Hotel (song)

Another wrong 'un. --Richhoncho (talk) 19:25, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Other Side of the Mirror (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derek Murphy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note

The result of the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illume (9–11) was that the song is not notable enough to have its own article, and it was redirected to the pertaining album. Please refrain from undoing the redirect. The sources that were there a few minutes ago do not establish notability for the song. Kraxler (talk) 02:09, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's is notable!! 1. Fleetwood Mac song about 9/11 2. Info on unreleased songs from the subject 3. Plenty of sources 4. Bass player John McVie strangely plays the black keys on it.

In the Meantime

I've reverted your edit to the tracklisting at In the Meantime because you've introduced a lot of stuff that looks very strange. It looks a lot like you're trying to say that Stevie Nicks wrote or contributed to most of those songs, which as we both know, is not true. You should probably start to follow some of the rules if you want to be taken seriously. Bretonbanquet (talk) 11:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's just because I copied the concept from her page. Does it show Stevie's name on the page itself? No. So why does it matter? Nobody sees it. It's you nitpicking at my work. -talk:Visnvoisnvo

What are you talking about? You think you can add information to an article that's blatantly untrue, but it doesn't matter because it doesn't show? Yeah, I "nitpick" at that. If you reinsert it, we can go through the whole warning / reporting thing. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:21, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And if you must use the tracklisting template, don't keep repeating the composers' first names. First name on first mention; surname only thereafter. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No dude. Come down. I was not purposely putting wrong information. I copied the template from Stevie's Wild Heart album. It was a mistake. -Visnvoisnvo

Ways to improve I'm The One (song)

Hi, I'm Onel5969. Visnvoisnvo, thanks for creating I'm The One (song)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Does not appear to meet either WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I'm The One (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I'm The One (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm The One (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Enchanted (Stevie Nicks album)

added a link pointing to Mike Campbell

Fleetwood Mac discography

added a link pointing to Mirage (album)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Twisted (Stevie Nicks song)

The article Twisted (Stevie Nicks song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS. No evidence of notability after searching.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Azealia911 _talk 13:47, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Live at the Marquee 1967

The article Live at the Marquee 1967 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album, fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Azealia911 _talk 13:52, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop It! I spend all my time for it to be deleted? No! It's not right. Get a life! Geesh. The second show they played, featuring Brunning not McVie. It's an album. I'm sure people want to read it. - Visnvoisnvo

Proposed deletion of That's the Way That Love Goes

The article That's the Way That Love Goes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable single, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Azealia911 _talk 13:52, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Not That Funny

The article Not That Funny has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable single, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Azealia911 _talk 13:55, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Two Kinds of Love

The article Two Kinds of Love has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable single, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Azealia911 _talk 13:55, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Visnvoisnvo. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Telling an editor to "Get a life" because they PROD'd one of your articles is not productive, maybe attempt to improve the article as opposed to lashing out at the nominating editor. Thanks, Azealia911 _talk 20:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Two Kinds of Love for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Two Kinds of Love is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Kinds of Love until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Azealia911 _talk 21:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Live at the Marquee 1967 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Live at the Marquee 1967 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live at the Marquee 1967 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Azealia911 _talk 21:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Not That Funny for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Not That Funny is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Not That Funny until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Azealia911 _talk 21:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Twisted (Stevie Nicks song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twisted (Stevie Nicks song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twisted (Stevie Nicks song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Azealia911 _talk 21:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rattlesnake Shake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rattlesnake Shake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rattlesnake Shake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Azealia911 _talk 21:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

Well aren't you getting a lot of attention! As you probably know, I'm Dobbyelf62. You've probably seen me around on various discussion logs and other articles. I would like to thank you for putting time into making all of these articles. I had planned to create many of these articles at one point or another but for some reason they would never happen. So it's nice to have someone doing all of this work. That being said, many of these articles have been proposed for deletion. While some of these I have opted for redirect (nothing personal), I have recently found all of your new articles very solid. So good job! I'm doing my best to improve these articles that have been proposed for deletion (I've already worked on Not That Funny and Rattlesnake Shake) and I plan to work on them even more. If I were you, I would hold off creating any more articles for now and make sure that the ones you've created survive. You can do this by adding more background information and sources. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. I'm more than happy to help! Dobbyelf62 (talk) 12:14, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well thanks for being the first nice person. Thanks for additions on those articles.

Reliable sources

Please try and use reliable sources for your additions. Unreliable sources include YouTube, Discogs and the Fleetwood Mac Ledge site and its discography. There is no editorial oversight on them. Also, having someone on Facebook tell you something doesn't cut it on Wikipedia. Thanks, Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:42, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rattlesnake Shake

If I were you, I would go to the articles for deletion page for "Rattlesnake Shake" and place your vote. I'm not sure if the article will make it. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 01:51, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dobbyelf62, please don't encourage users to vote a certain way. Azealia911 _talk 02:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Azealia911, this is the creator of the article, so I found it appropriate to notify the user of how the deletion discussion was going. Nowhere in that message did I tell Visnvoisnvo to vote keep. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 19:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't need to spell it out. Visnvoisnvo was already notified of the discussion, and as the articles creator, you know well that they're likely to vote keep, urging them to "place your vote". "I'm not sure if the article will make it" is you warning them that if they don't vote keep, the article that they created may well be deleted. I can see what the message meant. Azealia911 _talk 19:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I never viewed it. So until she pointed out it was up for deletion I did not even notice. - Visnvoisnvo

Azealia911 I did expect Visnvoisnvo to vote "keep"; it was a safe guess. I'm glad you have a better understanding of what I meant.! Dobbyelf62 (talk) 19:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue Denim (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Michael. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Vito

Yes, his albums are basically notable, but stick to the studio albums and the official live albums, as anything else probably isn't notable. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that none of those were notable enough for their own article, as they didn't chart (if they were singles) and it's unlikely that there's enough reliable info on them to make a decent-sized article. Even though the artists are highly notable, and the album is notable, the individual songs are pretty obscure, except perhaps for "Crystal" as Fleetwood Mac recorded it as well. I'm not sure that would be enough for an article though. Bretonbanquet (talk) 18:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Total Drumming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loops. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Template:Rumours

A tag has been placed on Template:Rumours requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. HandsomeFella (talk) 17:14, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John T. Mather Memorial Hospital

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John T. Mather Memorial Hospital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.matherhospital.org/history.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 02:32, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Visnvoisnvo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Howdy. Do you know if the North Carolina gubernatorial election is decided? I'm having some problems at Roy Cooper. -- GoodDay (talk) 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC) :)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:JaredKushner2016.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:JaredKushner2016.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 05:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Folmsbee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York, United States. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Your recent editing history at Wilbur Ross shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You've violated the WP:3RR and you have two (2) editors who have disagreed with you. I'd strongly recommend you use the talk page and don't revert per WP:BRD, or I'll take this to a notice board. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 18:43, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Fleetwood Mac, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Robert J. Bentley, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. "Plans to resign" does not mean "resigned". – Muboshgu (talk) 21:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Listen man, I don't know why you keep changing this. The AP says he resigned at 5:05pm.

AP says he "plans" to resign. I don't see confirmation that he has resigned. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He has already resigned.

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:KayIvey.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:KayIvey.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MB298 (talk) 23:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know how to do that, but heres the website https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/2645231022/6d17f74dcdb2a93a208e354d7b9c5d9b.jpeg. Thanks.

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Stephenmiller.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Stephenmiller.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MB298 (talk) 23:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Jaredkushner.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Jaredkushner.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MB298 (talk) 23:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Ivankatrump1.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Ivankatrump1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MB298 (talk) 23:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop uploading copyrighted images.

If you continue to do this, you may be blocked. MB298 (talk) 23:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I dont see the problem...

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Stephenmiller.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Stephenmiller.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 14:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ivankatrump1.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Ivankatrump1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 14:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ivanka Trump

Just wanted to drop you a note that I reverted your edit at Ivanka Trump not because of the sourced content, but only because that parameter doesn't exist in that infobox. You will notice that it does not show up in the infobox. I tried to explain that in my edit summary. If your edit is showing up somewhere else in the article, then it's my mistake. Bahooka (talk) 21:40, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Senior staff within the Executive Office of the President have the title Assistant to the President, second-level staff have the title Deputy Assistant to the President, and third-level staff have the title Special Assistant to the President." Therequiembellishere (talk) 00:43, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dick Cheney

I've started an RfC at Talk:Dick Cheney regarding the position of Acting President. MB298 (talk) 01:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Callista Gingrich

I have unprotected the page but there needs to be some discussion on the talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jewel-Eyed Judy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jewel-Eyed Judy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewel-Eyed Judy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. A Guy into Books (talk) 22:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Visnvoisnvo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Visnvoisnvo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Thanks for contributing to the article Template:Christine McVie. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that all articles must have categories. Please help by adding more categories to the article you edited. Thanks! P.S . If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 78.6 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mirror, Mirror (Stevie Nicks album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mirror, Mirror (Stevie Nicks album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirror, Mirror (Stevie Nicks album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SummerPhD^v2.0 03:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CA-48

Hello! Normally when Wikipedia decides when to say someone won an election it is normally editors wait until an election is called the AP before making the declaration here. So until they call it we hold off. Cook Political report is a good source but you normally need more than one source to say someone has won an election so this is why we normally wait until the AP makes the call. I think the call may come tomorrow when the next vote count comes in but I have no idea when it will come. Wollers14 (talk) 03:47, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]