User talk:VishalKGuptaJi
Use of multiple accounts
[edit]
Hello, VishalKGuptaJi, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Gauravdelhi.wiki (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:B3:B050:517C:CAFE:2E5C:C1C7 (talk) 11:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- I am not connected with anyone, Also I'm not having multiple accounts. Thanks talk 11:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
/
[edit]
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Psychologs a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Psychologs. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 09:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of C. S. Gopala Panicker
[edit]You have placed a deletion tag on this page I created because you did not find the subject notable as per your research. I would like to know why because the opening sentence of the opening sentence of the article itself clearly says the subject was a pioneer of short story literature in Malayalam, along with five others. (K. M. Tharakan, A Brief Survey of Malayalam Literature: History of Literature, p. 72). Also his name is identified as a prominent figure in the early prose literature as per Malayalam Literary Survey Vol. 14, p. 29. Per Sukumar Azhikode, in his 1977 article on the history of short story, it is mentioned "C.S. Gopala Panicker and E.V. Krishna Pillai emerge at a later stage in this evolutionary scale, linking the past with the modern" ("The Short Story in Malayalam", p. 10). Ulloor S. Parameswara Iyer, in his Kerala Sahitya Charitram, one of the most encyclopedic works on the history of Malayalam literature, dedicates a whole chapter for C. S. Gopala Panicker and also does an in depth analysis of one of his short stories (Kerala Sahitya Charitram, chapter 63.2 (in Malayalam)). All of these literature clearly says Panicker was an important figure in the early prose literature. I would object the deletion, and probably add a couple more sources that identifies him as a pioneer in Malayalam literature. Thanks. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 11:45, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
January 2023
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.