User talk:Vis-Techeditor

This is Vis-Techeditor's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Beklik (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

University almanac (and all kinds of students newspaper/registrations really), news sites with comment sections and website of organizations that the subject is a part of can not be used to demonstrate their notability. The rest of the sources where the subject was only mentioned once or not mentioned at all don't help either. Multiple significant coverage from independent and reliable sources are needed to prove that the subject passes WP:ARTIST or WP:NBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sam Beklik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 19:28, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sincerely for your valuable feedback and review. In all the sources I provided, the subject was explicitly mentioned in relation to his work and responsibilities, including the State Theater Mainz, State Theater Oldenburg, Berlin Parkaue, and more. They specifically mentioned the subject as the stage designer of the production.

I would like to keep the article open for future editing, and including additional sources would be a wise approach. Once again, I express my gratitude for your review. Vis-Techeditor (talk) 21:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vis-Techeditor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tutwakhamoe (talk) 19:28, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sam Beklik has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sam Beklik. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 23:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Beklik (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft definitely needs improving regarding its unencyclopedic tone. The sources in this draft are mostly good (except for the OTS press release which is by definition not a good source), however, the sources don't discuss Sam Beklik's work. They mention it, but that is not enough for establishing notability in a Wikipedia context. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Johannes for the helpful comment. I'll continue working on it. Do you have any sources in mind that you recommend removing? Vis-Techeditor (talk) 09:40, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sam Beklik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Beklik (March 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by User4edits was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No major improvements since last reviews. No citations in the first two sections. The tone is clearly not encyclopedic and without any references to them, it is almost promotional. To save the time of AfC reviewers, and to help the editor contribute more meaningfully at Wikipedia, I am rejecting this Draft.

Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 09:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Vis-Techeditor/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Vis-Techeditor/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 09:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sam Beklik

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sam Beklik, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 09:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Vis-Techeditor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Sam Beklik, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 09:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User4edits, Thank you for your feedback. Could you please clarify exactly what you tagged for deletion on this article? The last feedback and review, in August 2023 by Johannes, suggested that the article requires stronger references and improvement in terms of its unencyclopedic tone. There is no promotion in this article (although you mentioned it); it is solely the biography of the artist. Vis-Techeditor (talk) 09:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain your relationship with the individual and how you got this photo of the individual? Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 10:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User4edits ,I'm writing as the artist's assistant, and I want to confirm that I have this photo directly from the artist. Vis-Techeditor (talk) 13:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:25, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vis-Techeditor (talk) 15:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sam Beklik

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sam Beklik, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 14:57, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Yes, that was the first time I created a page on Wikipedia! Unfortunately, I can't contest the nomination as my account is blocked from editing that page. I'm unsure if creating a new page with the same material makes sense because I think it will happen again. It would be great if you could guide me on how to fix it or how to write a new one! Vis-Techeditor (talk) 15:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]