User talk:VirtualAvi

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:VirtualAvi/sandbox (October 23)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/VirtualAvi/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 13:31, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sapience (software) (November 13)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sapience (software).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:42, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sapience (software) (January 3)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sapience (software).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Anup Mehra ^✈ 08:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, VirtualAvi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Anup Mehra ^✈ 08:49, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Message

Hello. You have a new message at Anupmehra's talk page.

howdy

Hello Avi, noticed your work on Sapience. Anup declined my article too, they are a bit of a stickler. :-) While I'm waiting for another review, I have left you a note about Sapience. If you would like me to help you finish up the Sapience article, please leave me a message. Click 'talk' by my username, click 'new section' at the top, type your message, and click 'save'. Hope this helps, thanks for improving wikipedia. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 15:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, left you a reply over here, with some suggestions. Danke. User_talk:74.192.84.101#Responding_to_your_message_to_Avi_on_Sapience 74.192.84.101 (talk) 16:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Sapience Analytics logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Sapience Analytics logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Sapience Analytics was accepted

Sapience Analytics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

InfoBeans

Replying to your message on my talk page: the key point, which we don't make clear enough to new users, is that Wikipedia is not a business listing directory, or a place for companies to tell the world about themselves. It does not expect, or want, to have articles about every company that exists. It is actually quite selective.

The inclusion criterion is called WP:Notability, and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about?

That has the advantage of being a more objective test than "Do we think it's important?" and also of ensuring that there are independent sources for the article. It is quite a tough test, and many worthy organizations, especially new ones, cannot pass it. That is not at all to their discredit, but it means they are not suitable subjects for a global encyclopedia.

That's why the InfoBeans article, which just says what the company does, with no references but its own website, was proposed for deletion. It would be fine on Facebook or Myspace, but Wikipedia is different.

So what the article needs, if it is to be kept, is references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. There is useful advice at WP:Your first article and WP:Notability (organizations and companies).

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/InfoBeans where the discussion leading to the deletion was held. As JohnCD mentions, we need to await independent writings on the company. This means that you won't be writing it, or employing others to write about it. Deletion reviews or asking closing administrators are also possible, but in this case I don't think that you will get anywhere. It is possoible to write a Draft:InfoBeans page, but it will not be able to go to an article unless notability can be proved. Having 400 employees is not the same as notability. What we need to see are substantial newspaper appearances. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

InfoBeans

Hello, thank you for taking the initiative to update User:VirtualAvi/InfoBeans to meet our criteria for inclusion. While the article does look a lot better than the previously deleted version, it still contains a few issues concerning a lack of a neutral point of view. For example, the phrases "InfoBeans strives to create wow for its stakeholders that include customers, vendors and more importantly team members", and "Mitesh love to train and write on entrepreneurship.". If instances like these can be corrected, the article may be submitted at WP:AFC for further review. Thanks, Nakon 00:06, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:InfoBeans has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:InfoBeans. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: InfoBeans has been accepted

InfoBeans, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mr RD (talk) 00:08, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, VirtualAvi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article InfoBeans, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Given this previous discussion, a Connected Contributor declaration should be placed on Talk:InfoBeans. AllyD (talk) 09:01, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of InfoBeans for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article InfoBeans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InfoBeans (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AllyD (talk) 09:05, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from author VirtualAvi

Thank you editors SwisterTwister talk, AllyD (talk) and David Gerard (talk) for your inputs.

I see their is seemingly a conflict of interest as I'm one of the founders of InfoBeans. Let me share with you all that last year I worked with some of the senior Wiki authors to learn about AFC guidelines and how to maintain Neutral Point of View. I went through several iterations with wiki seniors to arrive to the article that is not a PR or advertising where we boast about ourselves. Our attempt was to make it informative and therefore listed plain simple facts about the company in its journey of last 16 years. None of these awards Asia's best employer, Great Place to Work are paid for and none of these certifications like CMMi, NSE India, CRISIL are acquired unfairly. Also all of these are reputed ones and known internationally.

I was not aware of the COI part at that time. I assumed that as a founder of a company, I'm the most informed person about my company, so I would be the best person to author an article on my company.

Nevertheless, I'm willing to work with you to remove or rephrase the article to meet NPOV guidelines. Also added declaration about COI on the page.

Please help me in editing the content to meet the Wikipedia guidelines. VirtualAvi (talk) 12:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sapience Analytics logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sapience Analytics logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sapience Analytics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sapience Analytics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sapience Analytics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dolescum (talk) 22:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:InfoBeans logo.png

The file File:InfoBeans logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for InfoBeans. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]