User talk:Virksaite

Welcome!

Hello, Virksaite, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Intelligent Crows, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 03:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Intelligent Crows

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Intelligent Crows. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Corvus. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Corvus – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. reddogsix (talk) 03:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Smart Crows

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Smart Crows. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Crow. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Crow – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. reddogsix (talk) 02:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 02:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. Acroterion (talk) 02:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop spamming various versions of the content on Wikipedia. If you do this again I will block you. Acroterion (talk) 02:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 03:03, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason= I'm a new user in wikipedia and I don't know all the rules in here I'm just trying to create a new article about smart crows,but I don't have idea why I can't,sorry If I made any mistakes.}}

As several editors have explained, you are creating articles that duplicate the existing article on Corvus. Your re-creation of multiple articles with variations on the title is disruptive. There is potential scope for improving the intelligence section in that article, and it may be that an article on the Intelligence of corvids might be created, but I suggest that you work on such a topic in draft space or in a personal sandbox first and ask other editors for a review before posting it. Persistently posting the same material after it has been deleted and after the reason has been explained to you is disruptive. Since you continued to do this after two warnings from me, with no attempt on your part at response,, I blocked you as I had said I would. Acroterion (talk) 03:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note to reviewing and blocking administrator Virkasite stopped by #Wikipedia-en-help on IRC and requested assistance with recreating this article. KSFT and I advised Virkasite that they should not attempt to recreate this article again. Virkasite was asked if they understood the reason behind their block and they were able to adequately explain that they were blocked due to recreating this article. They were also devised to wait until their block expired or was reviewed before editing again. It was also suggested they become more familiar with Wikipedia's policies. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 03:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping @Acroterion: --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 03:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping with this. I'm happy to unblock if the editor can discuss their understanding here. Acroterion (talk) 03:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, any time! --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 03:51, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intelligence of corvids (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Samtar was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Corvus instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intelligence of corvids and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 10:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Virksaite, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 10:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion: as the previous blocking administrator, you may be interested with the above -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 10:58, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Corvus . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not simply paste in your preferred wording. It is disruptive to the article. Wikipedia is an integrated encyclopedia, not a collection of unrelated essays, and you must gain consensus that your edits are appropriate and helpful for a general audience. Simply pasting the same content over and over again without learning from teh advice given by multiple editors is unhelpful to the encyclopedia. You must learn to accept editing advice and to put it to use. Acroterion (talk) 11:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intelligence of corvids (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DatGuy was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see FORUM. Also, per Samtar's comment it is already in Corvus.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intelligence of corvids and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 15:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Bird intelligence, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 00:14, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bird intelligence. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 00:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Decline Templates

Do not remove AFC decline templates from draft articles. The decline templates and comments are part of the history of the article and state that they should not be removed. Maybe you didn't notice this. Now you know. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:25, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Intelligence of corvids

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Intelligence of corvids. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Corvus#Intelligence. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Corvus#Intelligence – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. David.moreno72 04:13, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the article to User:Virksaite/Intelligence of corvids, and will delete it in a couple of days. (Wikipedia is not a personal website; it does not serve for you to host school essays or presentations.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 04:51, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intelligence of corvids (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Topher385 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Corvus instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As per the previous reviewers, I am declining this since the information is already included in another main space article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intelligence of corvids and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Topher385 (talk) 11:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Corvus, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 01:38, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I have said, Wikipedia is not a hosting service for school essays or presentations. As a courtesy, I have allowed your article to remain in your user space for a while, but note that in this form it is not suitable to become an encyclopedic article. (It is duplicate with material which already exists in other articles. It cites unreliable sources like TV Tropes and Cracked.com. It strays from its subject - if the article's subject is Intelligence of corvids, it should deal with that; general information about crows is off-topic. It is not written in the style of an encyclopedic article, either.)
Please don't attempt to move the current version of the article to article space, or to link to it from other articles. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 04:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As I had promised, I have now deleted the article. If you want to find an alternate outlet for it (e.g. a personal website or a blog) and didn't save its text, please e-mail me and I'll send it to you. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]