User talk:Violetmyers

Welcome!

Hello, Violetmyers! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 13:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank U Violetmyers (talk) 05:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

May 2024

Hello, I'm Lordseriouspig. I noticed that you recently removed content from Siege of Lohkot (1015) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lordseriouspig (talk) 07:38, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Conquest of the Western Turks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tang. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Devapāla's Campaigns against Pratiharas, you may be blocked from editing. . Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 08:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive , see the edit summary instead of giving unnecessary warnings Violetmyers (talk) 08:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Devapāla's Campaigns against Pratiharas. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 08:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How easy it is to give warning template and reverting without giving any explanation, read my edit summary first or talk first in the talk page instead of giving unnecessary warningsVioletmyers (talk) 08:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What you're doing is removing sourced content which you can't. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 08:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Violetmyers, You have been reported for persistent unsourced vandalism addition despite your last wrarning, as in here [1], it details a series of wars and no clear winner, you can not push your fan cruft opinion, both sides fought, won and lost several battles, it is just a list on them, never the less its not the only issue you have vandalized multiple articles with your unsourced edits! Dilbaggg (talk) 15:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir, I added information without sources only in Mughal Rajput wars I will not do this again pls sir sorry.Violetmyers (talk) 15:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, please always follow these guidlines: WP:RS, and WP:neutral, never be biased always be neutral and for every edit add sources, I am removing the report, hope you comply, there is no clear winner it just details the many battles they fought and each are seperate and both sides ultimetly were taken over by the British, the whole list of events has no winner, best wishes, good luck on Wikipedia, report removed for now. Dilbaggg (talk) 16:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Violetmyers Be careful, Next time you won't get another chance. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 16:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

RegentsPark (comment) 16:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mnbnjghiryurr (talk) 14:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:AdityaNakul per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AdityaNakul. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 13:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]