User talk:Vintage 1234

Thoroughly read the articles of History of Punjab only then edit articles based on truth.

August 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Multan, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:05, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamaguchi先生 ok I will give resources of my edits. I will give the google book link that verifies information of my edits. Vintage 1234 (talk) 19:15, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please allow my account to again edit Multan article. i will follow the policy of wikipedia edits as told by you. Thanks sir! Vintage 1234 (talk) 19:23, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vintage 1234. For the time being, please direct your edit suggestions to the respective article talk page at Talk:Multan. This will reduce any issues with original research and ensure that edits are attributed to reliable source, as required for all Wikipedia articles. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:23, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamaguchi先生 Why was i blocked. the user name Sutyarashi was disturbing the article Vintage 1234 (talk) 07:12, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm Packer&Tracker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Muhammad bin Tughlaq, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 04:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Amir Khusrau into Multan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 23:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DanCherek ok next time i will do this. Vintage 1234 (talk) 18:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mianwali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saraiki. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Message on my talk page

Vintage 1234 add any more message on my talk page with clear threatening of vandalism, and I will be forced to report you. Sutyarashi (talk) 09:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Second message

Do not keep undoing any edits without any explanation. If you continue to keep doing disruptive editing, I will report this issue on Administrators' noticeboard. For a time while, I have reverted your edit because you didn't provide any explanation for it.

If you are facing any problem with editing on wikipedia, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page.Sutyarashi (talk) 11:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sutyarashi instead of indulging in edit war. Lets talk on talkpage. Vintage 1234 (talk) 19:16, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thoroughly read the articles of History of Punjab only then edit articles based on truth.

you can read the book Tarikh i pakistan by yahya amjad Vintage 1234 (talk) 19:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can Also edit your articles on Lahore and give it the meaning i want but i dont want to speak lie.. so first of all Stop editing Multan article and discuss here in talk page Vintage 1234 (talk) 19:23, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a propaganda website where you can meanings you want. If you've any querry, provide sources for it. You've yet again reverted edits without any edit summary, and it's the last time I am warning you that if you continue your disruptive editing, you may get block. Sutyarashi (talk)

Also, you're obviously free to edit any article, as long as it does not turn into disruption. Sutyarashi (talk) 07:21, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sutyarashi So you want to write history of your own choice? you can not alter the truth Vintage 1234 (talk) 08:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dont threat me of blocking. I have many accounts to do the same with you Vintage 1234 (talk) 08:54, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been clearly edit warring, and ignoring the The three-revert rule. And I have already have given warning that such activities are not tolerable on Wikipedia. Also, your concept of truth is quite inexplicable.Sutyarashi (talk) 15:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3R Rule

Wikipedia has a policy to not revert any edits more than 2 times within 24 hours. You are requested to self-revert your edits, otherwise, you may get blocked.Sutyarashi (talk) 15:09, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Report

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Sutyarashi (talk) 06:03, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sutyarashi You will soon agree with my articles Firaun Okarvi sahab! Vintage 1234 (talk) 10:17, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add irrelevant messages on your talk page. Because you're indefinitely blocked, you may lose this privilege too for this.Sutyarashi (talk)

November 2022

You have been blocked from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 21:33, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed to Pakistanhistorian1947.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:54, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Black Kite User name Sutyarashi is disturbing the article from 3 days. I only corrected the article. Why was i banned Vintage 1234 (talk) 07:14, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Black Kite Why was i blocked on the report of Sutyarashi? He was abusing me and disturbing the article and was writing history of his own choice Vintage 1234 (talk) 14:50, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]