User talk:Vinodgund

Welcome!

Hi Vinodgund! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 12:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kasthuri (Telugu TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kasthuri (Telugu TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 17:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Agnipariksha (Telugu TV series)

Hello, Vinodgund,

Thank you for creating Agnipariksha (Telugu TV series).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a reception section with details of reviews of the show in reliable sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 01:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Radhamma Kuthuru

Hello, Vinodgund,

Thank you for creating Radhamma Kuthuru.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a reception section with details of reviews in reliable sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 01:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve No.1 Kodalu

Hello, Vinodgund,

Thank you for creating No.1 Kodalu.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a reception section with details of reviews of the series in reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 03:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Trinayani (Telugu TV series)

Hello, Vinodgund,

Thank you for creating Trinayani (Telugu TV series).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a reception section with details of reviews in reliable sources when available

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 03:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kasthuri (Telugu TV series) (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DaxServer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft lacks a Reception section or similar information to satisfy television notability or general notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kasthuri (Telugu TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kasthuri (Telugu TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinodgund! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chelleli Kaapuram moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chelleli Kaapuram, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 13:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ennenno Janmala Bandham moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ennenno Janmala Bandham, is not suitable as written to remain published. Reviewed is different to accepted. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Star Mississippi 14:44, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ennenno Janmala Bandham (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more citations from WP:RS. Minimal change since last draftify.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ennenno Janmala Bandham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ennenno Janmala Bandham, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 08:05, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:ArthurCurry70 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArthurCurry70. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:40, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ~~RoySmith~~,

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vinodgund (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had previous acounts, its got blocked becuase I didn't had detail knowledge on wikipedia editing.As a wikipedia beginner, I did some mistakes it leads me to my account get blocked. I'm keen interested to share articles with people, so I learnt from other article. So I decided to creat new account and adding article with proper knowledge. Please unblock this account, I will not do anything wrong.You can check my contributions towards wikipedia articles. Please let me know if any additional infromation required.~~Vinodgund~~

Decline reason:

No chance, not while you continue violating WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. WP:SO is your best option here, but given your extensive abuse, it'll be difficult for you to convince people to unblock you. In any case, no sooner than six months after your last edit. Yamla (talk) 12:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Kushi (2022 film)

The article Kushi (2022 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFF, should be deleted or moved to draft until release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Vinodgund

Thank you for creating K.G.F: Chapter 2 (soundtrack).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:14, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manikyam

The article Manikyam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manikyam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manikyam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manikyam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 13:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Devatha - Anubandhala Alayam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Devatha - Anubandhala Alayam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Devatha - Anubandhala Alayam

Hello, Vinodgund. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Devatha - Anubandhala Alayam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Devatha - Anubandhala Alayam

Hello, Vinodgund. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Devatha - Anubandhala Alayam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Malli Nindu Jabili for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malli Nindu Jabili is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malli Nindu Jabili until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 04:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]