User talk:Vincent Wedge

Hi. I'm a writer and researcher. Currently working on a creative non-fiction "novel" (for lack of a better term) that encircles several contemporary figures, non-profits, and commercial entities in architecture, philanthropy, and other tangentially related disciplines--so a lot of my edits and pages have to do with that stuff. A lot of my work on here is the result of my research for this project. I hope this information will help serve the Wiki community (but I'm also a nerd so I do get a kick out of this stuff). Totally don't know how to do this thing perfectly by any means so I totally welcome your engagement/tips on my talk page. Other wiki interests include the WP NYC project and WP Psychology. Vincent Wedge (talk) 00:52, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use of non-free images in draft.

Hi Vincent Wedge. This is just to let you know that I removed some non-free images from Draft:Macro Sea and Draft:David Belt. Each usage of non-free content on Wikipedia must satisfy the criterion listed at WP:NFCCP. Number 9 of these criteria says that non-free content may only be used in the article namespace. For reference, this means that non-free images, etc. are not allowed to be used in drafts or on user pages, talk pages, noticeboards, etc. Non-free content may be wikilinked to if necessary, but it cannot be displayed inline. Non-free content should only be added to draft articles after they have been approved or added to the article namespace. If you have any questions about this, please feel free to ask them here or at WP:NFCR. - Marchjuly (talk) 00:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited W Architecture & Landscape Architecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Harlem. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Rider Levett Bucknall (RLB)

Hello, Vincent Wedge,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Rider Levett Bucknall (RLB) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rider Levett Bucknall (RLB) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 13:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheLongTone, this page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rider Levett Bucknall (RLB) was deleted before I had the opportunity to fully address the concerns. Do you know if it is possible to have it restored to address those and resubmit for review? Spartaz I am not totally sure why the page was deleted rather than tagged for specific revisions? I am a PhD candidate at the University of Utah and this company is significant to anyone who knows contemporary Architecture, Engineering, and Construction, or the Crane Index--which is why I thought it would be relevant to Wikipedia. Rider Levett Bucknall is cited in my forthcoming dissertation. I don't know if that is a conflict of interest concern or not? Is there anything I can do here to restore the page? Admittedly, quantity surveying is a bit boring, but I thought the page would provide a useful starting point for anyone looking to dig further into the subject. Apologies if the work was too sloppy or something. Vincent Wedge (talk) 04:37, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Vincent Wedge[reply]

Nomination of Rider Levett Bucknall (RLB) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rider Levett Bucknall (RLB) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rider Levett Bucknall (RLB) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 16:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vincent Wedge. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve NoMad Piazza

Hello, Vincent Wedge,

Thank you for creating NoMad Piazza.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

References need improvement; the New York Times & Chicago Tribune are simply one-line mentions, and are identical texts & author (duplication). Other refs are not independent, don't mention NoMad Piazza, or are databases. What is needed is in-depth WP:SIGCOV. The Businesses section seems promotional/advertorial.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Netherzone (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Multitude (Podcasting company) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Multitude (Podcasting company), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:15, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi . Thank you for your contributions here. The article has one citation that includes a WP:FORBESCON reference. This can easily be removed, but do think it remains relevant as the contributor is a subject matter expert for Forbes and has written several articles re: current podcasting cultural climate.

The WSJ article though it is written by a founder of the company, I would argue, is EXTREMELY relevant to the subject at hand--given the pandemic's affect on popular culture. Are either of these references what you are referring to re: independent sources? Both can be removed and I think the article clearly remains substantive. For example: Multitude is and was mentioned at the time of initial submission in articles at Netflix, WFMT (studs Terkel), WBUR in Boston, NPR’s flagship station. These sources sufficiently meet WP:INDEPENDENT and DID exist previously prior to the article being moved to the draft space. These seem to have been overlooked? Thank you for your attention! Vincent Wedge (talk) Vincent Wedge (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Multitude (podcast collective)

Hello, Vincent Wedge, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Shushugah, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Multitude (podcast collective), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multitude (podcast collective).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Shushugah}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 14:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Shushugah: and . Thank you for your thorough contribution here. Could you please provide specific reasons for your issue regarding notability of Multitude (podcast collective) and why those warrant a deletion discussion? Thank you!Vincent Wedge (talk) Vincent Wedge (talk) 16:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Multitude (podcast collective) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Multitude (podcast collective), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multitude (podcast collective) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Multitude (Podcasting company)

Hello, Vincent Wedge. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Multitude (Podcasting company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]