User talk:Vinaixa67

Image Tagging Image:Aly & A.J. - On the Ride -Single-.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aly & A.J. - On the Ride -Single-.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Sue Anne 03:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Shayne Ward - That's My Goal -Single- (2005).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Shayne Ward - That's My Goal -Single- (2005).jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Sue Anne 03:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Lucie Silvas photos promo.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lucie Silvas photos promo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. feydey 19:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Lucie Silvas photos promo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lucie Silvas photos promo.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. feydey 19:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing warnings

Do not remove the image warnings from Your talk page, it is concidered vandalism and will get You blocked from Wikipedia. Please don't do it again. Thanks. feydey 19:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Aly & A.J. - On the Ride -Single-.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aly & A.J. - On the Ride -Single-.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. feydey 00:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Aly & A.J. - On the Ride -Single-.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Aly & A.J. - On the Ride -Single-.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. feydey 00:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks.

Tag removing

Do not removed no source/no license tags from images unless you provided what is wanted from the warnings. It is considered vandalism to remove them. Dont remove them again. Thank you. Moe ε 05:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsay Lohan

Your recent edits to the Lindsay Lohan article were reverted. You forgot to cite that her next album will be called "Upcoming third album" and I must say, I find this somewhat unlikely. --Yamla 16:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to revert the entry (but Yamla beat me by seconds) for two reasons: First, (Upcoming third Album) is not a title and would be in parentheses; second, and much more importantly, the entry is premature. Lohan, supposedly, (starts/started) writing this month, and it's premature to say when (or even if, for that matter) it will be recorded and released. (If/when) her record label announces a release date (title or no), then it should be added. Radio Kirk talk to me 16:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aly & AJ's Japanese Import Page

All this information on this page is on the Into the Rush page. So please delete this. There is no use for this page that has the same information. Tcatron565

Image Tagging for Image:Jessie Daniels - Jessie Daniels (2006).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jessie Daniels - Jessie Daniels (2006).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Jessie_Daniels.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Jessie_Daniels.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Jeannie 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jeannie 3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Dfahcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dfahcover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:06, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:AnaDaysof.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:AnaDaysof.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As this is obviously (to me) an album cover, I have so tagged it for you. Crypticfirefly 02:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Aly & A.J. - Into The Rush (Limited Edition).jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aly & A.J. - Into The Rush (Limited Edition).jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yamla 19:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Sonblue 02.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sonblue 02.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 19:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some information on the apparent source of this image to the discussion page for the image itself. If the information is correct, that's the kind of information that should be included on the description page for the image. Putting it in the linked article alone won't usually do it, because that is a separate page. Hope this helps! Crypticfirefly 03:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sonblue - Sueños de Ayer -Single- (2006).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sonblue - Sueños de Ayer -Single- (2006).jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 19:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Sonblue - Sueños De Ayer (2006).JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sonblue - Sueños De Ayer (2006).JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 19:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Everlife.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Everlife.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 19:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Edurne - Edurne (2006).jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Edurne - Edurne (2006).jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 19:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Shayne Ward - No Promises -Single- (2006).JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Shayne Ward - No Promises -Single- (2006).JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 19:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:PortadaEdurne.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:PortadaEdurne.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yamla 19:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

All images that are uploaded and used in an article need an accurate source identifying the copyright holder, a correct license, and a detailed fair-use rationale for each use of the image. Please do not upload any more images until you have gone back and fixed the ones you have already uploaded. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Yamla 19:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 24 hours for your chronic copyright violations. Specifically, this edit to Aly & AJ. --Yamla 15:13, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your continued copyright infringements have netted you a 48 hour block. --Yamla 22:34, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Beyoncé - B'Day (2006).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Beyoncé - B'Day (2006).jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — getcrunk what?! 23:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Aly & A.J. - Into The Rush (Deluxe Edition) (2006).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Aly & A.J. - Into The Rush (Deluxe Edition) (2006).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:CheetahGirls2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CheetahGirls2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:The_Cheetah_Girls_2_OST_(2006).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The_Cheetah_Girls_2_OST_(2006).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Requests for unblock

I was the original blocking admin. I have unblocked you. It seems likely that you will stop uploading images without the mandatory information and the block would have expired later today anyway. If you would like additional help in figuring out what information is required for an image, please ask and I'll try to help you out. --Yamla 16:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cite

Your changes to Aly & AJ were reverted. Although you claim this citation claims that U.S. sales are 578,116, it actually cites the previous figures of 573,112. Please see WP:CITE, WP:RS, and WP:V. Thanks. --Yamla 16:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

161 CLASSIC COUNTRY BILLBOARD #1'S 5,240 999 17 5,257
162 ALY & AJ INTO THE RUSH 5,234 -8 5,663 578,116
163 VARIOUS NOW LATINO 5,216 -8 5,641 222,327

Yamla see [[1]]

A Dramatic Life (Hilary Duff album)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your obvious efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we'd like to point out our policy against original research and for citing sources for the information you provide. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in checking the factuality of that article. Extraordinary Machine 22:23, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aly & AJ

Please do not use unfree images as decoration on articles. Per Wikipedia:Fair use criteria, "The amount of copyrighted work used should be as little as possible ... Do not use multiple images or media clips if one will serve the purpose adequately.", and "The material must contribute significantly to the article (e.g. identify the subject of an article, or specifically illustrate relevant points or sections within the text) and must not serve a purely decorative purpose." Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 18:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an URL confirming for "Bad Girl"

Because all Jenny talks about on her official site is that her nephew Jordan will have his birthday. KittenKlub 17:06, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

her mySpace:

As always the site is down right (Jenny crash landed myspace). It is funny because I checked AK's forum because of your message and just added the site, but I must have overlooked it and watched the Bad Girl instead. KittenKlub 08:42, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can't find it. It seems to be "Not Available". KittenKlub 09:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not Available means that there is no title yet

It's pretty normal. You put n/a or Not Available if you don't know it yet ;) KittenKlub 18:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ok! sorry!

It's fine. I still have to figure out how to get the song to play on my Opera, because the plug-in for the MP3 player doesn't function on my computer. So it'll only play on an old slow laptop. KittenKlub 19:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Girl: [2]

Big Kiss XXX. You're the greatest. KittenKlub 20:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

$ jejeje UR welcome! :P

Hilary Duff's fourth studio album

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you added new information to Hilary Duff's fourth studio album — we thank you for doing so, but in order to satisfy our verifiability policy policy, we need to know from which sources you got that information. Just adding a link to the article next to your addition would be all right, or you could put it in the article's discussion page. If you need any help, feel free to ask me at my talk page. Thanks!
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 21:54, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lacrymosa (Evanescence song)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you added new information to Lacrymosa (Evanescence song) — we thank you for doing so, but in order to satisfy our verifiability policy policy, we need to know from which sources you got that information. Just adding a link to the article next to your addition would be all right, or you could put it in the article's discussion page. If you need any help, feel free to ask me at my talk page. Thanks!
I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! Extraordinary Machine 19:46, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:RBD - Celestial (2006).JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:RBD - Celestial (2006).JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Let Go (Vanessa Hudgens song)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your obvious efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we'd like to point out our policy against original research and for citing sources for the information you provide. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in checking the factuality of that article.
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Please do not insert unsourced speculation and rumours into articles. Extraordinary Machine 20:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Alex Ubago - Aviones De Cristal (2006).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alex Ubago - Aviones De Cristal (2006).jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:04, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problems

You are repeatedly uploading images without providing adequate source (that's the copyright holder, which isn't necessarily the webpage from where the image originated) and copyright information. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing for a period. Please read Wikipedia:Image use policy, Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and Help:Image page. If you aren't sure what to do, feel free to leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions or my talk page. Extraordinary Machine 12:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:David Bisbal-Premonicion-Frontal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:David Bisbal-Premonicion-Frontal.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:06, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:David DeMaria-Caminos De Ida Y Vuelta-Frontal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:David DeMaria-Caminos De Ida Y Vuelta-Frontal.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:US5 INTHECLUB 0906 CD1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:US5 INTHECLUB 0906 CD1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:09, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:My own way home cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:My own way home cover.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Alesha Dixon - Knockdown -Single- (2006).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alesha Dixon - Knockdown -Single- (2006).jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:David Bisbal 5 Platino.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:David Bisbal 5 Platino.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Dover-Follow The City Lights-Frontal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dover-Follow The City Lights-Frontal.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Xema-Del Interior-Frontal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Xema-Del Interior-Frontal.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Do you have a source for Woman in Love

The reason is that it is not listed in the Top 50 list maintained by Bee Gee World ( http://www.beegees-world.com/top50s.html ). KittenKlub 13:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

watch in official Cadena 100 (Spanish chart) this week Woman In Love at #19

http://www.cadena100.es/la_lista_100.php

Totally weird. So it took her 6 months to chart? Thanks BTW KittenKlub 13:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm ... in Spain it had the premiere 3 months ago more or less and every time this one pleasing more! So it is normal that continue raising in Airplay

License tagging for Image:Fedde Le Grand - Put Your Hands Up For Detroid -Single- (2006).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fedde Le Grand - Put Your Hands Up For Detroid -Single- (2006).jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:08, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Nena Daconte - He Perdido Los Zapatos (2006).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nena Daconte - He Perdido Los Zapatos (2006).jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:AlianaLohanHoliday.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AlianaLohanHoliday.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:04, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:RBD-Rebels.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RBD-Rebels.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

2007 Emma Roberts album

I removed your recent addition to the Emma Roberts article, because I couldn't find any sources saying there are plans to release a second album in 2007. Moreover, she stated in several recent interviews that she would focus on acting for now and not pursue a career as a singer. If you do have sources for your claim that there will be an album in 2007, please provide them. --Fritz S. (Talk) 18:47, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Soraya Arnelas - Corazón De Fuego (2005).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Soraya Arnelas - Corazón De Fuego (2005).jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 18:49, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Play with Fire (song) and image copyrights

Your recent contribution(s) to to the Wikipedia article Play with Fire (song) are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks!
You've been asked not to upload images without providing adequate source and copyright information. The source is the copyright holder, which isn't necessarily the webpage from where the image originated, and for copyright information images must be given an accurate image copyright tag (e.g. {{albumcover}} for album and single covers). Please also read Wikipedia:Image use policy and Help:Image page. This is your last warning about this: if you continue to upload images without providing this information, you'll be blocked from editing for a period. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 15:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Jessica Simpson - I Belong To Me -Single- (2006).JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jessica Simpson - I Belong To Me -Single- (2006).JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 13:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i noticed this on Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images when uploading album covers you simply need to use the tag {{albumcover}}. if you need help on any other images feel free to message me on my talk page --Dan027 13:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jessica Simpson - I Belong To Me -Single- (2006).JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jessica Simpson - I Belong To Me -Single- (2006).JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bésame Sin Miedo nominated for speedy deletion

A tag has been placed on Bésame Sin Miedo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to provide more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately, and also put a note on Talk:Bésame Sin Miedo. An administrator should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 1 under Articles. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such material.A. B. 20:34, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lovelight charts

Hello. I was just wondering where the Spanish chart position for "Lovelight" came from. Can you please cite it for it can be verified. I'm just trying to make sure chart positions are correct on music articles because some users have been adding false chart information. Thanks. -- Underneath-it-All 00:33, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

in the Spanish Hot 100 (http://www.cadena100.es/la_lista_100.php)

Blocked again

You have been blocked for 48 hours for persistently uploading images without providing adequate or accurate source and copyright information. You've been blocked before for doing this, so I suggest you read closely: Wikipedia takes copyrights extremely seriously. As I have already requested, please read Wikipedia:Image copyright tags, Wikipedia:Image use policy and Help:Image page. Images uploaded to Wikipedia are deleted unless adequate source and copyright information is provided, and if you continue to ignore these messages you will be subject to a longer block. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 21:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

Blanking of Silencio (song)

Please do not blank pages, as you did to Silencio (song); this is considered vandalism. If you believe that this article should not be in Wikipedia, you can ask for its deletion instead. Do not hesitate to ask me on my talk page if you have any question. Schutz 08:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Viajar Contigo YouTube link removed

	You recently added an external link to YouTube in an article. It has been removed because the link pointed to a non-encyclopedic source. Per WP:COPYRIGHT: External sites can possibly violate copyright. Linking to copyrighted works is usually not a problem, as long as you have made a reasonable effort to determine that the page in question is not violating someone else's copyright. If it is, please do not link to the page. Knowingly and intentionally directing others to a site that violates copyright has been considered a form of copyright infringement in the United States (Intellectual Reserve v. Utah Lighthouse Ministry). Also, linking to a page that illegally distributes someone else's work sheds a bad light on Wikipedia and its editors. If the site in question is making fair use of the material, linking is fine. Please refer to Wikipedia's policy on external links for more information. You have been warned. --Strom 16:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chart trajectories

For your future reference, chart trajectories should not be included in articles per WP:SONG and WP:NOT#IINFO. — ShadowHalo 09:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article prodded

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Hear Lies Betty Curse, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Hear Lies Betty Curse. You may remove the {{dated prod}} template, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Patstuart^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:RBD - Celestial (2006).JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:RBD - Celestial (2006).JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 14:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Little More Personal (Raw)

We're sorry, but your edit to this article has been reverted. The last known cited release date was 26 December 2006; to change that date, a reliable source is needed. Thanks. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 22:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RBD sales

I've noticed that u have added the latest sales for RBD's Celestial album. Could u please give me the link to where u got this info from, so I could use it in the near future too? -- Luigi-ish 23:33, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This Link: http://www.ukmix.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=41312 (Billboard 200)

Thanks -- Luigi-ish 00:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Soccx

Please see WP:BAND. Soccx has no claims of notability and evidence that it meets the critreia at BAND. And don't put bogus protected tags on articles. User:Zoe|(talk) 20:17, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No Hay Igual

Please cite reliable sources for every chart position you add or change. This applies to every article, not just the No Hay Igual one. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 15:11, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Lindsay Lohan

Sorry, your edit has been reverted. Per WP:CITE, a credible reference/citation is needed for inclusion in the article.--Pinay06 (Talk•Email) 19:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changing song information

Please stop changing information about songs without providing a source. You may do so either by typing the URL into the edit summary, or by adding it in as a reference. You have been asked several times to fix this behavior; please do so, or you may have to be temporarily blocked. -Patstuart^talk|edits 19:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Como veo que también sabes hablar el español, me gustaría saber que información no he puesto porque ultimamente solo he retocado tablas y he añadido posiciones en lista y he puesto las correspondientes referencias... en el caso de Lindsay Lohan que me han puesto arriba es un poco raro... porque en discography sale que en Summer 2007 abrá TBA y luego en la página prinicpal no lo puedes poner...

y creo que todo lo que he puesto hasta fecha de hoy no me he inventado nada... no tengo otra cosa que decir reviselo bien y argumenteme todos los errores. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinaixa67 (talk • contribs)

Gracias por responder; lo siento si hemos mordido demasiado. El problema es, más que todo, que usted no ha proveído ninguna fuente para los cambios que ha hecho. En Wikipedia, estamos tratando de tener información de fuentes fidedignas: favor de ver es:Wikipedia:Verificabilidad. Hay mucha gente cambia los datos en los artículos de los cantantes: a veces, hay un error, y a menudo, es el vandalismo o un fanático que quiere que su cantante parezca mejor (o peor). No tenemos una razá para creer que usted es un vandal (véase a es:Wikipedia:Presume buena fe, pero, si usted puede proveer las fuentes para los cambios, probablemente no los reverteriremos. Puede poner el enlance en el edit summary abajo, o (preferiblemente), usando citas como: <ref>http://website.com/datos.htm?artistID=624</ref>. Espero que esta respuesta le ayudará en el futuro. Patstuart^talk|edits 21:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! lo intentaré!

AfD Nomination: Josh Hoge

I've nominated the article Josh Hoge for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Josh Hoge satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Hoge. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Josh Hoge during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. Metros232 13:55, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Ashley Tisdale - He Said, She Said -Single- (2007).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashley Tisdale - He Said, She Said -Single- (2007).jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Metros232 16:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Metros232 16:07, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You NEED to give sources

Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia did not provide specific references or sources. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Editors may choose to remove material you have contributed if it is not verifiable. Please provide specific references in your contributions to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content. You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Metros232 16:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, your edits to Edurne, are speculative and/or constitute original research and cannot be included. Please cite your edits with a reliable source, one that is verifiable. Thank you. Metros232 17:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You have been asked to stop adding information to articles without providing sources on numerous occasions. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. You cannot simply add "TBA" albums that are due out in 2007 without providing sources that state that there will be an album. You cannot change album sales totals, chart positions, or anything of the like without sources. Thank you, Metros232 18:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vinaixa, por favor, provee las fuentes para los cambios que haces, especialmente los que tienen que ver con los numeros: [3]. Es claro que tu sabes las estadisticas de fuente alguna; por favor, ponlas en el edit summary o como una referencia en el articulo usando los tags <ref>. Patstuart^talk|edits 20:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no puedo ponerlo xk es mediante clave de acceso y claro si pongo la web tienes que tener la clave... además hay veces que lo dicen por la televisión y no hay una fuente. da igual no te preocupes

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. You have been warned time and time again to provide sources but you continue not to do so. Metros232 17:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mira listillo, acabo de escuchar en Televisa mexico que Belinda esta trabajando en un album en Ingles que editará a mediados de este año para dar su salto en USA. así que no me he inventado nada... y citar no puedo citar algo que acabo de ver en la televisión. Me parece bastante triste que me taches de metiroso cuando todo lo que he puesto siempre ha sido verdad!

Almenos podrías responder... como mínimo...

(Sorry, I do not speak Spanish) (Apesadumbrado, no hablo español) Please see WP:V, it is your responsibility to provide a reliable citation for any information you add. --Yamla 23:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ashley Tisdale - Headstrong (2007).jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashley Tisdale - Headstrong (2007).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 23:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on M-A-K-L-O-V-E-T-O-M-E, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Chris 73 | Talk 18:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Everlife songs.

I noticed you changed what i had about 2 songs being rumored cover songs. Do you have a confirmation that this songs are are covers? if not, i think it would be better to put that they are rumored to be covers. I'm just wondering and would like to know. Thanks.--Mister Pine 06:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! in the official page you can listen the all tracks and the two songs are covers.

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 72 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Metros232 15:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but In the edurne page the second studio album is confirmed in the Top Music Magazine (Spanish Magazine) was released April 17.

That's great, but how am I supposed to know that unless you source it? You add information to articles then give explanations only after people have reverted your edits or you have been blocked. You have to provide the sources when ADDING the information, not as a response. Metros232 15:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once I have edited it, then i put the second studio album has been a confirmee in the magazine Top Music. Please, add it of the magazine and put since it had stopped with the image of the album of edurne and everything!

It's not my responsibility to add the source for you. It was your responsibility and you didn't do it. You've been warned to add sources many times, but you continue not to do so. You can't tell me know that it's in a magazine, you have to add the source when you add the information to the article. Metros232 16:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok... Neither does it make fail to be so a polite evil eh? That seems that this making something illegal or bothering... I cannot deal like even not you fias on me as if it had put a lot of false information... I cannot put the link of the magazine because it does not have proper web page...

So I wait that valoreis better the information that I contribute because always me judging these without knowing anything of me

It knows me badly because my wikipedia likes much and always I try to help ... and I hate that you say to me that I lie

Image copyright problem with Image:Justin_Timberlake_-_What_Goes_Around..._-Single-_(2007).jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Justin_Timberlake_-_What_Goes_Around..._-Single-_(2007).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Everlife CovLoRes3002.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Everlife CovLoRes3002.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:RBD - Bésame Sin Miedo -Single- (2007).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:RBD - Bésame Sin Miedo -Single- (2007).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ciara - Like A Boy -Single- (2007).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ciara - Like A Boy -Single- (2007).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Hilary Duff - With Love -Single- (2007).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hilary Duff - With Love -Single- (2007).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ashley Tisdale - Headstrong (2007).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashley Tisdale - Headstrong (2007).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 08:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ashley Tisdale - He Said, She Said -Single- (2007).JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashley Tisdale - He Said, She Said -Single- (2007).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 08:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stranger (Hilary Duff song)

Please do not create articles about songs and write that they've been released as singles when they haven't. "Stranger" has been played on the radio most likely because Duff "previewed" the song as an album track at certain radio stations; it has not been released as a single. Extraordinary Machine 21:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content, as you did to Emma Roberts, is considered vandalism and may result in a block. --Fritz S. (Talk) 16:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With Love (song)

Regarding With Love (song): The Total Request Live video countdown is not an official record chart, so please do not list it in the "Charts" section in the article or infobox. Please read Wikipedia:Record charts for more information. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 21:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

Hi, the recent edit you made to NASH(group) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 16:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Sunblock - Baby Baby (Feat. Sandy) -Single- (2007).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sunblock - Baby Baby (Feat. Sandy) -Single- (2007).jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Amar Es Lo Que Quiero

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Amar Es Lo Que Quiero, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ShadowHalo 18:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:RBD_-_La_Familia_(2007).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:RBD_-_La_Familia_(2007).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 18:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:The_pussycat_dolls_feat_timbaland-wait_a_minute_s.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The_pussycat_dolls_feat_timbaland-wait_a_minute_s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 18:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WGACover.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:WGACover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 18:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week as a result of your disruptive edits to Edurne. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. You need to stop adding unsourced information. Metros232 14:05, 22 April 2007

Edurne annouced in a TV show that the first single isn't "No Quiero Más" that this song is only for promotional TV Shows... the real first single will be announcend soon.

Orphaned non-free image (Image:My Chemical Romance - Famous Last Words -Single- (2007).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:My Chemical Romance - Famous Last Words -Single- (2007).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:3102 dp.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:3102 dp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 05:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wanna be the rain

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on I wanna be the rain, by Luigi-ish, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because I wanna be the rain fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

This song is not notable in any way. It is not a single, nor received any sort of airplay anywhere.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting I wanna be the rain, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate I wanna be the rain itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1 month block

For more unsourced edits like this and I wanna be the rain, you have been blocked for a month. It is not enough to see that an album is "TBA" without having a source proving this. It is also not a good statement to say that a song "will probably" be included on an album. Metros 22:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ch!pz - Past.Presents.Future Part II (2006).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ch!pz - Past.Presents.Future Part II (2006).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:El Sueño De Morfeo - El Sueño De Morfeo (2005).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:El Sueño De Morfeo - El Sueño De Morfeo (2005).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jump In! OST (2007).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jump In! OST (2007).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Jordan Pruitt - No Ordinary Girl (2007).jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jordan Pruitt - No Ordinary Girl (2007).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lucie Silvas - Last Year -Single- (2006).jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lucie Silvas - Last Year -Single- (2006).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Soraya Arnelas - Ochenta's (2006).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Soraya Arnelas - Ochenta's (2006).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Soraya Arnelas - Corazón De Fuego (2005).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Soraya Arnelas - Corazón De Fuego (2005).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:The Little Mermaid OST (2006).jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:The Little Mermaid OST (2006).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Nashportadasingle.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nashportadasingle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Within Temptation - The Heart of Everything (2007).JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Within Temptation - The Heart of Everything (2007).JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —♦♦ SʘʘTHING^(Я) 08:56, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Operacion Triunfo 2006 Adelante--Frontal.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Operacion Triunfo 2006 Adelante--Frontal.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Xema-Del Interior-Frontal.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Xema-Del Interior-Frontal.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for two weeks

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent copyright infringement. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Extraordinary Machine 16:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Extraordinary Machine 16:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Nelly Furtado - In God's Hands -Single- (2007).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nelly Furtado - In God's Hands -Single- (2007).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Booty luv boogie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Booty luv boogie.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked for one month

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent copyright infringement. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Extraordinary Machine 23:33, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Extraordinary Machine 23:33, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:NASH - Capaz De Todo (2006).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NASH - Capaz De Todo (2006).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:NASH - Capaz De Todo (Edición Especial) (2006).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NASH - Capaz De Todo (Edición Especial) (2006).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RBD-Rebels.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:RBD-Rebels.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fedde Le Grand - Put Your Hands Up For Detroid -Single- (2006).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fedde Le Grand - Put Your Hands Up For Detroid -Single- (2006).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:My Chemical Romance - Famous Last Words -Single- (2007).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:My Chemical Romance - Famous Last Words -Single- (2007).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sunblock - Baby Baby (Feat. Sandy) -Single- (2007).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sunblock - Baby Baby (Feat. Sandy) -Single- (2007).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lorena - Lorena (2007).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lorena - Lorena (2007).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Portadadisconashd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Portadadisconashd.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tell It to My Heart (Royal Gigolos song)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Tell It to My Heart (Royal Gigolos song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:29, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Musical

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Musical, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Musical date=2008 February 01. Thank you.

AfD nomination of Sugar Daddy (Nina Sky song)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sugar Daddy (Nina Sky song), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugar Daddy (Nina Sky song) date=2008 February 01. Thank you.

Can't Regret What You Don't Remember

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Can't Regret What You Don't Remember, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Can't Regret What You Don't Remember. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 18:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nikki Flores

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nikki Flores, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Flores (2nd nomination). Thank you. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 20:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Drop Ya Body

A tag has been placed on Drop Ya Body, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Reverend X (talk) 19:33, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Soraya Arnelas - Corazón De Fuego (2005).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Soraya Arnelas - Corazón De Fuego (2005).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Edurne - Edurne.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Edurne - Edurne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 14:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of La Conexión (Mixtape)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article La Conexión (Mixtape), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 13:47, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Vinaixa67! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 50 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Edurne - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sonblue - Sueños de Ayer -Single- (2006).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sonblue - Sueños de Ayer -Single- (2006).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:24, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of In the Club (US5 song)

The article In the Club (US5 song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Single songs generally do not meet the requirements of WP:N, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:54, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sonblue - Sueños De Ayer (2006).JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Sonblue - Sueños De Ayer (2006).JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 20:49, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Catch Me If You Can (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Catch Me If You Can (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catch Me If You Can (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Aspects (talk) 01:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ultimate Music

Hello, Vinaixa67, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ultimate Music, appears to be directly copied from http://www.josepvinaixa.com/blog/info/. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ultimate Music if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 18:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ultimate Music (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

buff bills 7701 21:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Viajar Contigo

The article Viajar Contigo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 18:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sinking In

The article Sinking In has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 08:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Girls Aloud - Something Kinda Ooooh -Single- (2006).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Girls Aloud - Something Kinda Ooooh -Single- (2006).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NoWayOut

The article NoWayOut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article with no claim to notability made.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brielle Davis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brielle Davis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brielle Davis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ploni (talk) 18:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Not This Year

The article Not This Year has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]