User talk:Vikram Singh (Kumaoni)

February 2023

Hello, I'm TheManInTheBlackHat. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chandelas of Kalanjara (minor Chandela branch) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 20:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Humayun expedition on Kalinjar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Humayun expedition on Kalinjar, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 23:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste page moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Humayun expedition on Kalinjar. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:27, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No sir Vikram Singh (Kumaoni) (talk) 02:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 18:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No sir I'm not sockpuppet please unblock me Vikram Singh (Kumaoni) (talk) 01:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sir please unblock me I'm not suckpoppet of any guy sir please you can check sources all are contemprory i didn't spread false info Vikram Singh (Kumaoni) (talk) 02:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikram Singh (Kumaoni) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Sir please unblock me I'm not suckpoppet of any guy sir please you can check sources all are contemprory and also i didn't spread any false information or war edit and abuse etc, so sir please unblock me

Decline reason:

Combination of incoherent begging here and extensive evidence at the SPI. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:53, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vikram Singh (Kumaoni) (talk) 02:28, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]