User talk:Vikaskumar601

Recent edit to Graphic Era Hill University

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Graphic Era Hill University, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:57, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Graphic Era Hill University, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vikaskumar601. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Graphic Era Hill University, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Graphic Era Hill University. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 11:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Graphic Era Hill University

The content that you're repeatedly adding (and being asked to stop doing) appears to be copied and pasted from an external URL. You cannot copy and paste content from external sources like that per Wikipedia's copyright policies. You have not checked the copyright of the content or the publisher that you copied from, nor did you cite or acknowledge the external reference here at all. Continuing to copy and paste from external sources like that will result in your account being blocked. Please do not continue adding content to articles in this manner. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Graphic Era Hill University

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Graphic Era Hill University, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:24, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Vikaskumar601 reported by User:IVORK (Result: ). Thank you. — IVORK _Discuss 14:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikaskumar601 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am an employee of Graphics era university i was trying update the profile of vice chancellor from own website of graphics era by giving reference of the same. i do understand the copyright policy of Wikipedia but the content cannot be modified as it is a profile of an individual which cannot be modified or altered from its original content kindly unblock me i would definitely take care that no such violation occurs in future and further there are certain other updations are also needs to be done on Wikipedia about the university so kindly unblock me as soon as possible Vikaskumar601 09:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"the content cannot be modified"; I think you misunderstand Wikipedia. See WP:OWN and WP:COPYRIGHT. Yamla (talk) 12:16, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikaskumar601 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i believe there was some confusion at my part while understanding the policy on ownership content and copyright policy of Wikipedia as i have gone through it now and i would see that content written on Wikipedia is original and not copied from anywhere kindly unblock me

Decline reason:

See comments below. Kuru (talk) 12:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikaskumar601 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have checked the list of active blocks that i have been blocked indefinitely by one of the administrator kindly unblock me

Decline reason:

Yes, we see that. Please, do not create more than one unblock request at a time. You can, of course, add your comments bellow without the "unblock" template. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May i know how long will i be blocked as there are some important changes needs to be made on Wikipedia page about the university

i have been waiting too long to be unblocked but i not getting any response since i am blocked indefinitely i am unable to edit or update necessary changes to the university page on Wikipedia kindly unblock me as soon as possible since the violation of copyright was unintentional and bonafide.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikaskumar601 (talk • contribs)

Vikaskumar601, this request has been active a while and I assume many administrators have read it. My concern is that you are an employee of an entity who is unable to recognize their conflict of interest and intends to immediately resume aggressive editing of an article that they should ethically not touch with a ten foot pole. From your responses, I don't think you've read our policies at all; you're just saying what you think we want to hear so you can resume problematic editing. I'd be willing to talk to the blocking administrator if you can state you will avoid the articles you have a conflict with altogether, and contribute to the project in other ways - you'll need to pledge this and provide some indication that you've actually read the policies and guidelines linked above. Kuru (talk) 12:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, strike all that. In further reviewing the article, I can see you've socked to avoid this block. Nevermind. Kuru (talk) 12:34, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]