User talk:Vijayabhaskar02

Welcome!

Hello, Vijayabhaskar02, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hooane ltd, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Joseph2302 (talk) 11:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vijayabhaskar02&action=edit#[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hooane ltd

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hooane ltd, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of HooaneLtd

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on HooaneLtd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Interference 541 (talk) 05:49, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Karthik Kodakandla

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Karthik Kodakandla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://in.bookmyshow.com/person/karthik-kodakandla/1056950. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Atlantic306 (talk) 15:34, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content duplication changes

Changes been made as per Wikipedia copyright policy Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 16:44, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello Vijayabhaskar02. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to StuMagz, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Vijayabhaskar02. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Vijayabhaskar02|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:45, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 15:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC) I made minor edits on the user page or article with my research on the company which recently made into news by creating a buzz that they are under Forbes 30 Under 30 Asia List. Although Richard Branson Tweeted about this Company. That made me to write about this Company. This was not paid article or something. I making my contributions to the Wikipedia community as per the norms and rules. As a contributor i knew the pain of the message you indexed on me. Thanks in Advance for you response. Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 15:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 10:28, 5 June 2018 (UTC) Issue SolvedVijayabhaskar02 (talk) 10:28, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Vijayabhaskar02! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:33, Tuesday, July 3, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Vijayabhaskar02! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:36, Tuesday, July 3, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Vijayabhaskar02! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:09, Tuesday, July 3, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

July 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:43, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vijayabhaskar02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Wikipedia community may i know the reasons for the block. As am using VPN Network technology my IP address varies from time to time that's the reason it shows the multiple logins. As a legitimate user i sincerely follow the community policies. I Hope my contributions are my honest showcase to the Wikipedia. I sincerely Apologize if any mistake happened unknowingly in my case and pleading to you lift up my ban. Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 03:32, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 07:19, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vijayabhaskar02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think Everybody makes mistakes and I believe i too should get at least one chance. My works include of Famous Biographies like Sanjay Dutt Ramajogayya Sastry Papon Automation Anywhere StuMagz. As am a Journalist will use my office PC. As my PC is used by some unknown staff members at my office. I think they had made login into the Wikipedia with their account that's the reason i may be convicted. This has been done without my concern. It looks like Multiple account login issues. I sincerely Apologize for the mistake and without my acknowledgement this issue has happened. I will contribute more with my knowledge to the community. Hope my contributions are honest and reviewed. Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 05:48, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Decline because my investigation matches that of Curb Safe Charmer, below. Additionally, you seem to be claiming your office computer has been compromised. If that's actually what you are claiming, WP:COMPROMISED would apply. Yamla (talk) 13:07, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A Google search for "Vijaya Bhaskar" Hooane (Hooane Ltd was the name of the first article you tried to create) indicates firstly the conflict of interest you had in trying to create that article, and secondly that you are not being truthful in saying that you are a journalist. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vijayabhaskar02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If i made mistake without my concern it should be considered as unrealistic and should continue with probing on me with this issue. rather community should concentrate on the issue and provide me a solution. rather by blocking it makes disbelief in community you should consider one time apologize on this case. Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 07:07, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:56, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vijayabhaskar02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If i Violated community rules there is enough punishment given for me nearly a year i didn't made any contributions to the community. If i used multiple accounts on the same laptop it means am not bluffing community am eagerly waiting to contribute to the community give me a chance to prove myself. Request you to reconsider and unblock for the same. you can eavesdrop on me for the same.

Decline reason:

You previously suggested that your account was compromised- if so, it cannot be unblocked. You also have not adequately addressed your use of multiple accounts. 331dot (talk) 19:22, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vijayabhaskar02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My previous accounts were used to contribute to the community only. As i have conveyed my mistake and enough punishment was given for me. I request you reconsider my request and will not use community for wrong work. Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 19:33, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you are still continuing to make unblock appeals which do not address the reason for your block, I have revoked your talkpage access. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:22, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My previous accounts were used to contribute to the community only. As i have conveyed my mistake and enough punishment was given for me. I request you reconsider my request and will not use community for wrong work. Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 19:32, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have previously repeatedly lied about the situation. You have not addressed this. Simply waiting isn't sufficient, you need to regain the trust of the community after you deliberately squandered it. --Yamla (talk) 11:36, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Making all efforts to solve this issue. Although am not wasting any time of the community. To gain the trust you should give time and effort to prove myself right? Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 12:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS #29058

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Vijayabhaskar02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #29058 was submitted on 2020-02-19 19:09:32. This review is now closed.

Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vijayabhaskar02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My dear administrators and community members. Yes, I have committed and vandalized serious policy of Wikipedia. I had used multiple accounts too. I Accept my mistakes. I regret for the same and apologies for the ignorance. Here to make clear i have committed the socket puppeteer. I have used the accounts Vijayabhaskar02, Antonyrao, Rakeshroshan1992. As my client has given amount for article contribution i have committed these mistakes with Conflict of Interest. For the purpose of money making i made serious mistake and fake contributions to the community which is unacceptable. Though please give me a second chance to prove myself under your guidance. Monitor me keenly. In Future I sincerely contribute with the great hope and common sense activity to the community with valid citations and references. I sincerely request you to unblock my IP Address and unblock my accounts. so that i will be using only one account i.e Vijayabhaskar02 or upon your suggestion you can decide to which account i need to use for community contributions. Also i need your mentor-ship to contribution to the community in a better-way. Firstly if i got unblocked. I need your valuable suggestions and mentor-ship inorder to contribute to the community in a legit way. I will contribute and edit biography, Company articles Under your guidance I will be a knowledgeable person and should contribute the community in all aspects. Yes, I made a mistake and that mistake was made by my ignorance. because of the block am unable to contribute the community in a correct way. So I myself decided to give back best to the community. Also you can check my previous block request also with the key #30078 for which i couldn't submit the appeal with the key there is an issue with the same. Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 12:56, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:40, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What about Johnnysimons (talk · contribs), Johnhexer (talk · contribs), and Tanneruvenugopalam (talk · contribs)? I guess it's not incredibly important, but it would be nice to have a full disclosure. Also, since it's going to come up eventually: do you intend to write paid articles? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you NinjaRobotPirate because of my ignorance and half knowledge I created those accounts. Rather I don't remember that I created accounts for my greedy attitude. Also, I sincerely claim those accounts were created by me and request you to block them or put under watchdog. Initially I was forced by fellow mates to write paid articles for easy money but now got to know the community rules and policies so will contribute independently under strict administrator guidance only. Also I will not write any paid article on Wikipedia. Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 15:53, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You repeatedly lied about your behaviour in the past. Why on earth should we trust you now when you've repeatedly demonstrated you aren't honest? --Yamla (talk) 11:28, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Am here to prove myself Yamla as a legit person and want to do good with contribution for the community. cause previously I was involved with Conflict of interest with money loop. Now I got to know Wikipedia is a Non-profit and meant to do good for the community. This made me realized. Trust is a chance to be given prove myself and not be blamed. A chance is required for me to prove as a Trust worthy contributor. Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 07:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vijayabhaskar02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administrators please go through the above thread and acknowledge my effort. Requesting you to unblock and guide me for the contribution. Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 3:32 am, 6 August 2020, Thursday (11 days ago) (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Based on the commentary here and based on the account's history, I do not believe there will be a net gain to us. I have worries about your ability to communicate clearly with other users and I do not know what you intend to do if you were to be unblocked. Because of the many unblock requests you have made, I will also be revoking talk page access only (talk) 19:59, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2020

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

only (talk) 20:04, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karthik Kodakandla for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karthik Kodakandla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karthik Kodakandla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ab207 (talk) 07:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]