User talk:Vihaan Rajsingh

Vihaan Rajsingh, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Vihaan Rajsingh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Hero - Gayab Mode On moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hero - Gayab Mode On, is WP:TOOSOON and does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Amkgp 💬 09:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hero - Gayab Mode On for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hero - Gayab Mode On is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero - Gayab Mode On until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Amkgp 💬 09:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am still expanding this article. Vihaan Rajsingh (talk · contribs) 09:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hero - Gayab Mode On

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hero - Gayab Mode On requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero – Gayab Mode On. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Amkgp 💬 09:49, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the article being deleted? Vihaan Rajsingh (talk · contribs) 09:55, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I blocked? Vihaan Rajsingh (talk · contribs) 05:59, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just created an article of an upcoming Indian television show: Hero - Gayab Mode On. Vihaan Rajsingh (talk · contribs) 06:04, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vihaan Rajsingh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I created an article for an upcoming Indian television show Hero - Gayab Mode On and was blocked because a blocked user created the article before Vihaan Rajsingh (talk · contribs) 08:48, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, meaning that there is technical evidence to support it, so your connection to the other account or accounts is not in doubt. If you have not used other accounts(or are not working with others who did), you will need to provide a plausible explanation as to why technical evidence would indicate otherwise. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot:Vihaan Rajsingh (talk · contribs) 10:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You pinged me, but didn't say anything. You are free to make another unblock request for another administrator to review, but you are unlikely to be unblocked unless you do as I've requested. 331dot (talk) 10:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: What do I have to do to provide a plausible explanation? Vihaan Rajsingh (talk · contribs) 10:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: What do I have to do to provide a plausible explanation? Vihaan Rajsingh (talk · contribs) 11:37, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Vihaan Rajsingh (talk · contribs) 11:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Vihaan Rajsingh (talk · contribs) 11:44, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Vihaan Rajsingh (talk · contribs) 12:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Vihaan Rajsingh (talk · contribs) 12:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop pinging me. I can see this page. As I said, you need to explain why we might think you are using other accounts(or working with others) if you actually are not. 331dot (talk) 13:36, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vihaan Rajsingh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I am blocked and I understand the policy I was against.

I did something wrong and that it won't happen again.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:49, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vihaan Rajsingh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am blocked because I created Hero - Gayab Mode On

The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. Vihaan Rajsingh (talk · contribs) 13:54, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm revoking your talk page access as you clearly are just trying to waste our time. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 14:04, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, this is not why you were blocked. --Yamla (talk) 13:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Orphaned non-free image File:Hero - Gayab Mode On.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hero - Gayab Mode On.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]