User talk:Videogamer13

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to List of former Jews, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Grafen (talk) 12:17, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to List of converts to Islam. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Grafen (talk) 12:27, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hollywood Celebrities Converted to Islam

Hello, Videogamer13. You have new messages at Grafen's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

User page

Hi and thanks for the message. I trimmed your claims about being an admin as they had the potential to mislead. Let me know if you need any other help. --John (talk) 03:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Vandalism

No offense intended but you're clearly not an admin, so as John said, saying that you're an admin on your user page could be misleading. Deftera (talk) 15:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you here?

Look, if you are looking for something useful to do around here, I could help make some suggestions. But falsely claiming on your user page to be an admin and repeatedly adding unverified living people to a list of actors of a particular religion is just wasting other people's time. Please stop doing it. --John (talk) 21:12, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just help you to edit pages. Sorry, I don't want to waste the people's time. But I just know about the people's religion and others.

Sorry for my bad English, I'm Malaysian. --Videogamer13(talk). August 25, 2010 (UTC).

No problem on the English, plenty of people make useful contributions even when English is not their first language. But you absolutely must read WP:V to see why your edits are being undone; any facts you add need to be verifiable so that we and our readers can check that they are true. Please don't make any more edits until you have read and understood this policy. --John (talk) 21:43, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of World Rally Championship drivers, you may be blocked from editing. Prolog (talk) 21:38, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense

Please could you not post such rubbish on my talk page and others. Please keep your fantasies away from Wikipedia. This is your final warning. - mspete93 19:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at List of Jewish actors. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Prolog (talk) 04:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Videogamer13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm apologize, next time I don't want to make disruptive edit, creating hoaxes and vandalize Wikipedia pages again, I'm promise. But I don't know how I create the page and improve the article, so can you help me how I can do it?... And I will try to looking for citing verifiable and reliable sources for Wikipedia pages. So please unblock me, next time I don't want to make it. --Videogamer13 (talk) 05:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were given several warnings for disruptive editing since 22nd August, and you did not pay attention to them. My advice would be to consider which article(s) you would like to edit, and comment below on what changes you would make to them, and the sources which you would cite. Once you have shown some evidence that you are considering editing in a constructive way, perhaps another unblock request could be considered. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:14, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Videogamer13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now I will follow any Wikipedia rules of your policy and I don't want to make disruptive edit again next time, I promise. When I created 'List of Dakar Rally drivers and riders' page 3 days ago and it has been deleted and I gets blocked, this is not a disruptive edit. Please unblock me. --Videogamer13 (talk) 09:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

you have not addressed any of the points raised by Phantomsteve above. You also do not show any awareness of what you have done wrong.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

JamesBWatson (talk) 10:49, 15 September 2010 (UTC)}}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Videogamer13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm afraid for editing Wikipedia page. Please unblock me now, I have a job for sending a messages to other users. --Videogamer13 (talk) 10:21, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:50, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Videogamer13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Next time I will not continue to disrupting the pages again. I understand that what I did was wrong and I will not do it again. Sorry. And I hope I can contribute more constructively in the future.

Decline reason:

No, sorry, just a simple apology will not do. We have already been through several unblock requests and their answers. Before unblocking I want to see from you a full and detailed statement saying what you did wrong to get you blocked; only then will we really be able to accept your apology.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you give some examples of the kinds of edits you would plan to do? -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 14:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Videogamer13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not do it again. I promise. I hope to sending message to my friends and admins.

Decline reason:

See the conversation below. If your next unblock request does not directly address these issues, expect to have your ability to edit this page revoked as well. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will not continue vandalizing again.
I will not make disruptive editing again.
I will not creating a page myself again.
I will improve any article.
I want to asking by sending any message to any user's talk page.
I will make useful contributions instead.

--Videogamer13 (talk) 04:02, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I think that we need more than just "I won't do it again" - to be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
Click the Edit tab at the top of that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = [[Article title]] =) and save the page before you improve it.
Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 08:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to be unblocked, please apologize to admin so you won't do it again. And keep your mind, next time don't make a disruptive editing again.--Gtabigfan2010 (talk) 00:54, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to Gtabigfan2010, an apology and saying you won't do it again is not sufficient. Please see my previous message which explains how you can show us that you are serious about editing Wikipedia in line with the policies and guidelines of the site. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 18:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the articles that I have edited last time:

I have edited List of World Rally Championship drivers on September 1.
Then I have edited Championship Off-Road Racing on September 13.
Then I added List of Dakar Rally drivers and riders article on September 14 and it has been deleted then I have been blocked from editing. --Videogamer13 (talk) 22:38, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At the first time I registered, I forgot to review Wikipedia policy and test edit at Sandboxes. Sorry. --Videogamer13 (talk) 02:32, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Now I shall retire from Wikipedia. --Videogamer13 (talk) 02:52, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have a power to evade the block! --Videogamer13 (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]