User talk:Deftera

What have I done wrong? Leave a post below.

Talk:Steven Slater

Hi Deftera! You reverted an editor on this talk page, citing vandalism. I'm not totally sold on their post (it's arguably off topic) but I'm unconvinced it's vandalism. I've reverted you (recognising your good faith). TFOWR 19:09, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

T.s.p.e

Thank you for your work on the article in question, however a full blanking without giving a valid CSD reason or challange of content could be considered vandalasm. I have restored the content and subsequently put the article up for a CSD:A7 nomination. Hasteur (talk) 15:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gary J. Alter

Hi Deftera,

You placed a clean up tag on my first page I created on here. Can you please take a look at it again and let me know if it looks better of what I could do to inprove it??? I am just learning how to do the coding on here so it is interesting learning it on the fly. Janemillert 09:51, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

explanation

hi i did not edit the other user's post, i just change the heading because it was false and misleading. he call his heading "FINAL WARNING" but it was not a final warning because i got another "final warning" right below it, so it will make readers of my talk page think that i had received two legitimate final warning, when this is not the case, because the first one was just an opinion. thx--Bad edits r dumb (talk) 20:54, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The first was an only warning which is also a final warning. Cheers! M J ₉ ₄ 20:55, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of an external link

The webpage that I linked to has an excellent resource for people wishing to learn about Tajikistan (you also appear to have removed links from Kyrgyzstan) It has an overview, detailed information about its history and culture, information about its climate, information about its geography, and most importantly advice about travelling there (do's and don'ts e.t.c, cultural considerations, what situations to avoid) which I felt was essential to anyone reading the wikipedia page and wishing to travel there. The information on it I have not seen anywhere else, and I think is relevant to any reader of the page. What exactly is your issue? David —Preceding unsigned comment added by David07905 (talk • contribs) 12:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David, and welcome to Wikipedia! There are a number of reasons for my removal. First of all, Wikipedia aims to provide encyclopedic information on the countries such as politics, religion, etc. from a neutral point of view. The website you linked doesn't seem to be neutral, and seems to be aimed at tourists rather than providing encyclopedic content. Second, the source has to be known to be reliable, especially for large articles like well known countries (such as a well known media source or scientific journal). Third and probably foremost, Wikipedia looks down upon links to sites that exist only to sell an item or service; links to these sorts of sites unless they are relevant to the topic are usually considered spam. Also if you want to sign your comment use four tildes (~) at the end of your post. Thanks for your message and if you need anything don't hesitate to ask! Deftera^talk 13:25, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AE article rescinded

Hi, I was the one who was attempting to rewrite the Artix Entertainment section. I don't understand what was inherently wrong with the section. If you could please explain the specifics and how I can better expand the section, that would be great. All I did was expand and clarify aspects of the company and its workings. I understood the need to avoid advertisement and took that into consideration. If you can please help me with this article, I'd be deeply appreciative. Stratos40 (talk) 22:10, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stratos, and thanks for your edits. The reason I edited the page was because it had a few irrelevant details (such as Adam's hopes on creating AdventureQuest or the Battle Bar, etc); Wikipedia aims to provide only a summary of the article in question rather than details on game storylines, etc. Also, the article had a slight promotional/informal tone and included a lot of AE jargon such as staff nicknames which might confuse some readers. Again, thanks for your contributions and if you haven't already I suggest you read the policies to learn what is and isn't accepted on Wikipedia. Deftera^talk 22:39, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response. I personally feel this article is extremely sparse and could do with more information about the company itself, hence my addition of many of the staff names and some info of the company's beginnings, which felt like vital information to an article about the company itself. Other video game company's articles have information about how the heads started working and I don't see why it shouldn't be allowed here. Would removing the section about the staff listings and trimming off the access info about each game (The plot summaries and such) be enough? I can always create pages specific to each game to avoid that extra info bleeding into the company's Stratos40 (talk) 22:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. It's not that I don't think a description on how the company got started should be displayed on the page, I just felt the current description failed to properly document the founding (such as focusing on Adam's motivation and hopes instead of the basic who, what and where). Deftera^talk 13:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

UAA report

Hi, I noticed that you filed a repeat report of User:Ewe Fokker, but the report is already in the holding pen as it is being discussed with the user. Please note that UAA is only for blatant violations, and if a report has been removed or moved into the holding pen it is because it is not felt to be a blatant violation warranting immediate action. The user appears to be making constructive edits and co-operating with suggestions to change their username, so that is likely to resolve the issue. If they do not agree to change their username the report should be taken to WP:RFCN for comment; feel free to take it there if you can't make progress discussing it with the user. Thanks for following up. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 22:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I've just left a follow-up note on the user's talk page. I think for the sake of WP:BITE and WP:AGF it's definitely worth trying to follow it up with the user rather than taking it to WP:RFCN (especially as they've indicated that they will change their username if necessary), since the user's edits so far have been consistent anti-vandalism work. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 22:50, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AdventureQuest Worlds

I think the plot may have been a bit over shortened. Not that it was at a perfect size before, but one paragraph seems overly short. Also, there are some inaccuracies.

The plot revolves around the player hunting down thirteen "lords of chaos" one by one, a group controlled by the antagonist.

When was it explicitly said the player was actually hunting down the Chaos Lords? And the player is not doing it "one by one", it's just that Drakath only seems to have one Chaos Lord at a time.

The player may also choose to side with two other factions, known simply as Good or Evil.

The player is forced to choose one side. There is no "may" about it. Your faction choice hasn't, as of yet, actually had any effect on the storyline. - Harry Blue5 (talk) 19:19, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I only played AQW for a short time and can't say I ever really got into it so I may have made a couple of mistakes. The plot section was a little ameteurish and ridiculously long with a paragraph devoted to each CL, I only really intended my description to be used as a placeholder until someone wrote a decent sized plot that was suitable for Wikipedia. I didn't know enough to do that but couldn't just leave it as it was either so I did the best I could. As I remember you were allowed to do the CLs in any order and didn't have to play through the good/evil cutscene, not sure if it's changed since then. Deftera^talk 19:52, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember being allowed to skip the good/evil thing. Unless you do all the stuff in the wrong order, but in which case, you're not doing the plot right, dood. While I'm not sure if you're forced to do it in a certain order, its clear that they're designed to do each CLord in a certain order. Harry Blue5 (talk) 21:59, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 05:00, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]