User talk:Victor Ohids

Hello! Please leave a new message. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing!

Also take care of the following points:

If I left you a message; please answer on your talk page, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. And if you leave me a message; I will answer on my talk page, using {{ping|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in my response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to your talk page.
Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page or at the bottom of the respective section, and use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ":"
Sign and date your entry by inserting four tildes "~~~~" at the end of your message.
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
Avoid personal attacks, do not troll or use this page as a chat room.
Please, always assume good faith.
If the topic is something personal, please email me and leave {{ygm}} on my talk page.
And if you are impressed by my contributions, consider giving WikiLove.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:38, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Persecution of Christians. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Don't add a "missing citations" template to an article with 500+ references again. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SarekOfVulcan: I understand and it will not happen again. ~~``_``~~ (talk) 23:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Black Kite every edits I did I made them with complete good faith. I understand why I got block it will never happen again. ~~``_``~~ (talk) 00:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please sir @Black Kite: I requested for unblock two days ago but I do not get a response til now. Sir may you please take a look on my request. Thanks Victor Ohids (talk) 04:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot:, May you look on my unblock request again please. Look like other admins are busy. I will be appreciated sir thank you.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Victor Ohids (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believed I've made several disruptive edits, every edits I did I made it with good faith I did not mean to harm an article.Yes i violated Wikipedia policies and guidelines by engages in disruptive cite-tagging I understand what I blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions.~~``_``~~ (talk) 00:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In another request, please describe those productive contributions you want to make, given that most if not all of your edits were suboptimal. 331dot (talk) 08:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would add outside the context of the block that your signature does not "make it easy to identify your username" and "It is common practice for a signature to resemble to some degree the username it represents". I would request that you change your signature to better resemble your username. 331dot (talk) 08:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot:, I've changed my signature as you requested. Thank you so much for the head up.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Victor Ohids (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believed I've made several disruptive edits, every edits I did I made it with good faith I did not mean to harm an articles.Yes i violated Wikipedia policies and guidelines by engages in disruptive cite-tagging. I started participate on Wikipedia:WikiProject Reliability on 2 November 2022 I am very new on Wikipedia:WikiProject Reliability. I completely understand what I blocked for and am positive i will not repeat or do it again, and I will make productive and positive contributions like, I will edit respectfully, I will follow every Wikipedia policies and guidelines, if I get involve in any incidents with any editor I will (both of us will) resolve it positively. Most important things, I will not violate Wikipedia policies and I will not engage in disruptive cite-tagging again Victor Ohids (talk) 11:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is a sockpuppet. Girth Summit _(blether) 19:33, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hey @Black Kite: now is one week since I got blocked I did not get any response from anyone. I don't know what's going on but please if your seeing this can you review my request. I'm a faithful Wikipedia editor Victor Ohids (talk)

Hello @Explicit: I am sorry for the disturbing, I requested for unblock since 5 November but I did not get any response. Please sir if you're free take alook or review on my request.Victor Ohids (talk) 12:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]