User talk:Victor MacTavish

This is Victor MacTavish's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Hello, Victor MacTavish, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammed M. Mahmoud (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhammed M. Mahmoud and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Victor MacTavish! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammed M. Mahmoud (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhammed M. Mahmoud and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 12:35, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But isn’t there a reference? It shows that he works there Victor MacTavish (talk) 16:18, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 9K111 Fagot, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 17:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I know why you’re reverting my edits? Victor MacTavish (talk) 18:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Claims need to be cited to a WP:RS. This excludes militaryfactory, as per discussions found at WP:RSP Loafiewa (talk) 19:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain Wikipedia:RSP in words? I really don’t understand it Victor MacTavish (talk) 19:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not User:Loafiewa, but you appear to be citing a self-published website. See WP:INTREF and WP:INTREF4 for a tutorial overview on referencing. Regards -Fnlayson (talk) 19:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
alright thanks, but recently I checked that on users of military aircrafts ex Mil Mi-17 world airforce is used as reference and it is a self published website Victor MacTavish (talk) 20:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Qara Qoyunlu. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:29, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean non sense? Go read page 519 of the book, it’s accurate and you haven’t even read the reference Victor MacTavish (talk) 13:58, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And what about the other citations that state something different? They don't matter at all because they don't fit your POV? Moreover, the citation you used is not even WP:RS, George Curzon, 1st Marquess Curzon of Kedleston is not even a historian. Also you're not allowed to evade your block, create as many accounts as you want, I'll make a SPI for each of them [1]. I'll also request a global ban if you disrupt other Wikipedias too. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, edit warring whilst logged out isn't gonna help either [2]. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:39, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Combatuser1 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Combatuser1. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]