User talk:VicMizrahi

VicMizrahi, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi VicMizrahi!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Alfred Besaw (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boson was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Alfred Besaw and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Boson (talk) 21:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! VicMizrahi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Boson (talk) 21:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some suggestions

If the article makes no credible claim as to why the subject is notable, it may be "speedily deleted", so to avoid that I would suggest that you think about why the subject of the article might meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines and state this clearly in the introduction, for instance that he was recognized as being the first person to do something special. This would need to be supported with a reference, for instance to a magazine article about him. Feel free to ask my advice on my talk page. --Boson (talk) 21:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your question on my talk page (feel free to answer here, I will watch this page for a while): The main problem here is establishing that the subject meets the notability guidelines, and it may be that this is not possible. Your proposed statement goes in the right direction of making a credible claim to such notability, but any claim should be backed up by published, reliable, independent sources. A source stating that his postcards are "sought after by collectors" would be helpful. More on this below, but it is probably best to be very careful with words like "iconic" and best to avoid stating prices (since their assessment may require expert judgement). A sourced statement that he was a pioneer in the field might help. I would recommend reading the policy page Wikipedia:No original research, in particular the bits about primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. What you really want are secondary sources where Besaw and his work are discussed. Official records, catalogue entries, credits or simple mentions are not sufficient for establishing "notability" (in the sense used by Wikipedia policies and guidelines). By the way, the ISBN you gave for the book by Semas needs fixing (it should be 0-7385-3109-X) as does the series title for the Zech book. As regards adding Besaw to the list of notable residents of Reedley, the page can be edited in the same way as this page. If the article on him is accepted, his notability is established, so it might be a good idea to wait. Otherwise you should substantiate his notability there (for instance with an inline reference to a book that states that he was a resident of Reedley and states or implies that he was notable). If you are using the classic editor (rather than Visual Editor), an inline reference to a book can be added by inserting text in the following format: <ref>{{Cite book |series=Images of America |title=Reedley |first=Kenneth |last=Zech |publisher=Arcadia|isbn=978-1-4671-3267-1 |date=2015|page=6|quote= }}</ref> --Boson (talk) 14:52, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VicMizrahi. You have new messages at Boson's talk page. -- 11:08, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:George Alfred Besaw concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:George Alfred Besaw, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:George Alfred Besaw

Hello, VicMizrahi. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "George Alfred Besaw".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rockhaven Sanitarium Historic District has been accepted

Rockhaven Sanitarium Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]