User talk:Vhstef

March 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Neoconservatism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Neoconservatism was changed by Vhstef (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.89607 on 2018-03-26T12:24:46+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vhstef, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Vhstef! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

18:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trump Doctrine (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Foreign Policy of Donald Trump instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The information contained in here largely duplicates the existing article, but the existing article can be edited boldly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trump Doctrine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Trump Doctrine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:23, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (The Bulwark) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Bulwark.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please help resolve incoming links.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:15, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neoconservatism in Spain moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Neoconservatism in Spain, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can develope the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 10:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Neoconservatism in Spain concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Neoconservatism in Spain, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:46, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

M.Bitton (talk) 17:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware that the extended protected requirements also applied to the talk pages, because I was obviously not able to edit the article but the "reply" option was there. My apologies for the confusion. Vhstef (talk) 18:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you appear to have been already aware of the sanctions, please stop creating pages about topics related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only created something so that others could continue working on it. It is of course a skeleton for now, but I will leave it alone. Vhstef (talk) 22:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creating new pages also falls under the contentious topic restrictions. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of August 2024 Tel Aviv suicide bombing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article August 2024 Tel Aviv suicide bombing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/August 2024 Tel Aviv suicide bombing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aydo h8^[contribs] 03:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]