User talk:Vhinkellyconceptz

Direction on how to write about an artist

how do i write about an artist? Vhinkellyconceptz (talk) 22:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Vhinkellyconceptz

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Vhinkellyconceptz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dorsetonian (talk) 04:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

okay how do i go about it?

Good Day. Vhinkellyconceptz (talk) 07:51, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dorsetonian should i delete the article? Vhinkellyconceptz (talk) 07:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, regular editors such as you and I cannot delete pages. An admin assessed the page and concluded it should be deleted, and they did it. Dorsetonian (talk) 11:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

okay sir

Thanks so much for the feedback. I appreciate it. Vhinkellyconceptz (talk) 17:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... It shouldn't be deleted every information added is true about him and i don't think it's Spam --Vhinkellyconceptz (talk) 07:54, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of the notability or otherwise of the subject, it was an inappropriate use of your user page. If you want to work on an article prior to publication you can use a sandbox. However, I would advise you that attempts to create this page so far have failed to show notability, and that your editing suggests you may be a sockpuppet of the blocked user Minister Joseph Lb. Not all contributions are welcome; Wikipedia is not a place to promote artists who do not meet the notability threshold. Dorsetonian (talk) 11:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Minister Joseph Lb per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Minister Joseph Lb. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

okay thank you so much. I've read all procedures about editing and i tried following the pattern that was used in this page Moses Bliss. How do i go about it? Vhinkellyconceptz (talk) 17:44, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

okay thank you so much. I've read all procedures about editing and i tried following the pattern that was used in this page Moses Bliss. How do i go about it?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vhinkellyconceptz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Vhinkellyconceptz (talk) 17:47, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 18:10, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.