User talk:Vfcalvi

Draft:Amédée Paris concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Amédée Paris, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amédée Paris

Hello, Vfcalvi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amédée Paris".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel Roggero (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miguel Roggero and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Miguel Roggero, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 17:23, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made updates - are they sufficient? Vfcalvi (talk) 18:40, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vfcalvi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 17:23, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel Roggero (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miguel Roggero and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 14:31, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Miguel Roggero

Hello, Vfcalvi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miguel Roggero, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Miguel Roggero

Hello, Vfcalvi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Miguel Roggero".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:35, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Miguel Roggero

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Miguel Roggero has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:55, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Vfcalvi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Vfcalvi, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello Vfcalvi. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Fuse Media, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Vfcalvi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Vfcalvi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Whisperjanes (talk) 03:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm not affiliated with Fuse Media. My employer does have Fuse Media as an account, but I am not on that account and my salary is not connected to the company's compensation from that account. I understand how this can lead to confusion and happy to update affiliation if you still deem it necessary. Thanks! Vfcalvi (talk) 15:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply, Vfcalvi, and I appreciate the info you gave above. Just to understand what you said above, have you edited Wikipedia as part of your job? - Whisperjanes (talk) 22:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! To add further clarity, no I do not edit Wikipedia for my job. I am tangentially connected to Fuse Media only through my employer as they are a client of the company as a whole. I am not on the account and not personally affiliated with Fuse. I understand the potential COI here though, so happy to update or disclose whatever I need to be compliant. Vfcalvi (talk) 18:30, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, Vfcalvi. If that is the case, then I would follow the info that was posted on this page in July, earlier this year, about conflict of interests. You should at least disclose your potential COI, and there is information on how to do that here: WP:DISCLOSE. In this case, I would add the disclosure template to the talk page of the Fuse article or your userpage.

If you need more help or want a quicker answer, the WP:TEAHOUSE is also a good place to go for any questions you have. I say this mostly because I am not always online, and there are other editors who are much more experienced (with COI editing and otherwise) that answer questions at the Teahouse. - Whisperjanes (talk) 18:58, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, great. I've updated my user page accordingly. Might need some help with any other edits. Vfcalvi (talk) 19:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you meant to, I wanted to mention that it looks like you used the paid disclosure template on your userpage, rather than the conflict of interest user template from WP:DISCLOSE. I would reference the "General COI" section, unless you meant to disclose as a paid editor. - Whisperjanes (talk) 19:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it correct now? Vfcalvi (talk) 19:30, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks correct on the Fuse Media talkpage, but I meant your userpage has a paid editing template, rather than a COI template like {{UserboxCOI}} from WP:DISCLOSE. You are free to leave that there, though, if you feel it is accurate. - Whisperjanes (talk) 19:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Better safe than sorry! Thank you. Vfcalvi (talk) 19:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: +Life (Plus Life Media) (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

please note we don't use external links in the body of an article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:+Life (Plus Life Media) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:+Life (Plus Life Media)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:+Life (Plus Life Media), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. OnlyNano^talk 14:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plus Life Media moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Plus Life Media. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 03:45, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plus Life Media (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Plus Life Media and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:44, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Vfcalvi. Thank you for your work on Fuse Media. Another editor, Kingsmasher678, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kingsmasher678}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kingsmasher678 (talk) 03:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]